Continuing from the last post, check out Eagleman's website at this link.
In the "research-other projects" tab I read his article "The moral of
the story." It asserts that the neural purpose of stories is to
"simulate
potential situations.... By learning the rules of the world and
simulating outcomes in the
service of decision making, brains can play out events without the risk
and expense of attempting them physically.... The production and
scrutiny of counterfactuals (colloquially known as 'what ifs') is an
optimal way to test and refine one’s behavior."
He goes on to
note that learning new information or skills requires that we must be in
a state of curious anticipation and emotionally engaged. And story is
the door that opens up this learning experience, not facts and figures.
Stories "accomplish the same evolutionary function as religion: defining
groups, coordinating behavior and suppressing selfishness in favor of
cooperation."
While he doesn't provide research supporting these
claims in the article he does point to the book he is reviewing, where
apparently some of that research is found. And one can find plenty of
research on this in the literature on framing in the previous link
provided. Framing is based on the same research, how to "tell a story"
effectively to shape opinion and behavior, as in voting. Stories are not
just what we tell ourselves to justify our behavior but more
importantly how we can to some extent reverse engineer and direct our
zombie programs to more 'evolved' purposes.
As an aside, given
the above and my propensity for a good story in the form of literature,
it might behoove us to sometime read some good fiction. Pattern Recognition by William Gibson is one such good book, and on our current theme with Incognito.
Also see these IPS threads: The world is made of stories; Ecology, a new story; Big stories, the new universe; Lakoff's Thinking Points.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.