From Mark Edwards' book Organizational Transformation for Sustainability: An Integral Metatheory (Routledge, 2010):
"There
is a danger, however, that when the conservative side of metatheory
stops being flexible and creative, the situating of theories
and lenses becomes a process of typing and categorization. The AQAL
framework may be particularly prone to this problem because of the
prescriptive manner in which it is used. The fundamental task of
metatheorizing is not to be able to categorize theories within some
preexisting, overarching framework but to ensure that the unique
contributions of middle-range theories are accommodated with the
metatheory" (208).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.