See this study: "Neural Correlates of Post-Conventional Moral Reasoning." We can and must make value judgments about which moral operations are better for society as a whole instead of just rationalizing that earlier brain structures and the types of morality associated with them are just 'different' and thereby acceptable.
The abstract:
"Going back to Kohlberg, moral development research affirms that people
progress through different stages of moral reasoning as cognitive
abilities mature. Individuals at a lower level of moral reasoning judge
moral issues mainly based on self-interest (personal interests schema)
or based on adherence to laws and rules (maintaining norms schema),
whereas individuals at the post-conventional level judge moral issues
based on deeper principles and shared ideals. [...] Results demonstrate that subjects at the
post-conventional level of moral reasoning were characterized by
increased gray matter volume in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and
subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, compared with subjects at a lower
level of moral reasoning. Our findings support an important role for
both cognitive and emotional processes in moral reasoning and provide
first evidence for individual differences in brain structure according
to the stages of moral reasoning first proposed by Kohlberg decades ago."
More from the article about a "more sophisticated level of moral reasoning":
"While Greene and Haidt contend that no brain region is exclusively
dedicated to moral reasoning, the finding of increased gray matter
volume in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex/subgenual anterior
cingulate cortex in subjects with a more sophisticated level of moral
reasoning is supported by a body of functional neuroimaging studies
demonstrating that moral decision making activates a neural network
centered in the prefrontal cortex and in particular in the ventromedial
PFC."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.