Continuing this post, I noted that Edwards Edwards uses the holonic lens as a 'scaffold' to
accommodate all the lenses (189). That lens is the container schema
according to cogsci. And it has its own premises and inferences that
apply to that schema, but it is only one of dozens
of schemas. So I question that the holonic lens can truly provide a
syntegrative scaffold for all the other lenses. Lakoff et al. certainly
do not use the container schema to do that with the other schemas.
However, in rereading Philosophy in the Flesh it turns out that
our basic level categories and actions, those with which we directly
interact with the world, depend on
gestalt (part-whole) structure. Mental imagery (image schema) are also
based on this gestalt perception. So it seems that the container image
schema (holon), while only one of several different schemas, is
fundamental in the sense above.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.