By Peter Pogany. He uses Jean Gebser to analyze the different historical forms of economics, and the emerging form that goes post-capitalist. Excerpts:
"Since the history of consciousness is also a history of social
consciousness, which is never without economic interpretations, it is
mirrored by the history of economic thought."
"By the end of the 18th century, cultural evolution demanded global-scale organization to
maintain its accelerating mode. The chaotic transition that began with the French
Revolution and ended in the early 1830s led to the establishment of the world’s first
global system (GS1), characterized by laissez faire and metal money. It lasted from
approximately 1834 (the “birthday of the industrial proletariat” [Polanyi], a year of
intense legislation in Britain concerning the poor) until the outbreak of World War I in
1914.
"The period 1914-1945 was another chaotic transition that brought the second and current
global system (GS2) -- mixed economy/weak multilateralism -- into existence. (Until the
end of the Cold War, socialism remained an unsuccessful alternative for global self-organization.)
"At present, physical limits are beginning to slow cultural evolution. Its demand for free
(accessible) energy (in the form of low entropy matter and energy carriers), and capacity
to absorb pollution are coming into conflict with non-expendable terrestrial constraints. As
a consequence, the world has either entered or is on the verge of entering another period
of chaotic transition.
"A new global system (GS3), two-level economy/strong multilateralism, will be needed to
create a sustainable balance between culture and humanity’s ecological niche. Micro-activities
will have to be made legally subject to globally-determined and nationally
allocated macro-constraints. The required transformation of individual behavior and
institutions will be vast."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.