Response to Camosy

Joseph Camosy had two interesting posts in the anti-capitalism thread referenced in the last post, starting with this one. My response:

I see exactly the sort of people's movement arising from the bottom led by the likes of Sanders' and Warren's top-down leadership as fulfilling Lukac's requirements. Sanders gives voice and direction to an already emerging people's resistance to oligarchy.


I also agree when you noted that the kennilingus so-called highest kosmic address is not necessarily the best functional fit for this, as it has little to no connection with this people's movement. Hence I've resisted suggestions that we fill Sanders head with kennilingus to make him 'integral.' To me that is counterproductive and smacks of just a top-down theory bordering on ideology without the bottom-up connections necessary to effect real change.