Following up on this post, the article on inter-bridging sounds up my alley for prepositions and image schema. An excerpt describing points I've raised time and again in various
places throughout the IPS forum (highlighted by my italic emphasis):
"The postmodern distrust of meta-positions is understandable given the
problematic assumptions that often accompany such views, but the point
put forward by Gioia and Pitrè is different. Their assumptions are of
valuing pluralism or taking diverse meta-level positions and of retaining marginal views
(Gioia & Pitre, 1990). Questioning the assumption that there are no
connections between paradigms can open up researching for multiple overlapping or connecting areas (Gioa and Pitrè 1990, p. 592; Schulz and Hatch, 1996, p. 534). Such approaches would not try to fuse or merge, but to relate and negotiate between conflicting positions […] Concentrating on the permeability of paradigmatic borders and zones of transition
can be detected, where different elements might be combined or
reconfigured towards rendering novel insights or findings. […] In order
to (re-)construct such transitional zones, we propose an integral
pluralism framework as a bridging concept. By this we mean, a bridging
in which different elements or positions are not reduced or subsumed
into each other. Rather, they are a seen as contributing their own
insights to a more comprehensive understanding. This integral
orientation permits bridging between paradigms as well as between micro-, meso- and macro-levels of analysis and their interplay” (125).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.