From this FB post:
"What’s the difference between progressives and their opposite –
regressives? Progressives believe we’re all in it together: We all
benefit from public investments in schools and health care and
infrastructure, and from efforts to reverse climate change. We all do
better with strong safety nets, reasonable constraints on Wall Street
and big business, and a progressive tax system. Progressives worry that
the middle class is shrinking, a quarter of our nation’s children are
poor, and the rich and privileged have become powerful enough to
undermine our democracy. The issue for progressives isn’t the size of
government; it’s who government is for: It should be for all of us, not a
privileged few.
"Regressives take the opposite positions. They believe each of us is on
his or her own: Investments in schools or health care or infrastructure
are better done through private individuals and corporations than
government. Safety nets coddle the weak. Those who are losing ground
lack adequate education and ambition, and must learn to take
responsibility for themselves. Those who are thriving are entitled to
their rewards; constraints and taxes on them only reduce their incentive
to invest. They have every right to their disproportionate power and
influence. Regressives want to take us back to 19th century social
Darwinism."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.