LP brings this up in this FB post. My response:
From this Ning IPS thread:
It
struck me that Derrida's descriptions of khora and differance sound
reminiscent of Wilber's description of consciousness per se in Integral
Spirituality (Shambhala, 2007). For example Wilber says in Chapter 2:
"This
happens to fit nicely with the Madhyamaka-Yogachara Buddhist view of
consciousness as emptiness or openness. Consciousness is not anything
itself, just the degree of openness or emptiness, the clearing in which
the phenomena of the various lines appear (but consciousness is not
itself a phenomena—it is the space in which phenomena arise)" (66).
[...]
[Derrida is] different than Wilber's metaphysical ground wherein all
forms arise. The latter seems much more like Plato's archetypal realm of
Ideal forms that step down into the sensible world and “in”form it.
Granted Wilber doesn't see them as “pre-formed” but rather much more
amorphous involutionary and morphogenetic “potentials.” Still, it seems
this is part of the involutionary versus evolutionary dualistic scheme
with one side being origin and absolute, with the other being result and
relative.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.