Following up on the last post, a
couple of other points. Kennilingus assumes that we need a cream of the
crop, the best and the brightest, to first model what's next and then
lead the masses thereto. I'd suggest that this is a view still stuck in
the throws of metaphysical rationality and capitalism. It's very much on
display in not only the Republican Party but the establishment
Democratic Party. See Thomas Frank's work, for example.
Meanwhile,
the emergent collaborative commons movement is well underway without
any top-down models hatched by the cream memers. And it was spawned by,
you guessed it, the so-called lower right internet. Granted it wasn't
the internet by itself, but it's very distributed structure allowed a
lot more sharing over a much wider populace so that the tenets of the
collaborative commons were enacted without a theory of everything to
guide it. And now, after the fact, the likes of Rifkin and the P2P
Foundation are reporting on it, and also noting the philosophical and
psychological changes enacted therefrom.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.