Good article on it here. An excerpt with my emphasis in italics.
"Piaget
underestimated the rich precocious logical knowledge already present in
infants and young children, and he overestimated the logical abilities
of older children, adolescents and adults, who commit systematic errors
even in very simple logical tasks (Houdé, 2000; Kahneman, 2011). These
logical errors usually occur when older children, adolescents and adults
rely on prepotent responses, illogical intuitions, or misleading
strategies (such as heuristics) rather than on logical algorithms.
Importantly, the ability to overcome those errors is directly related to
the ability to inhibit these intuitive forms of thinking (Houdé, 2000;
Kahneman, 2011; Houdé and Borst, 2014). Consequently, today the discrete
Piagetian stages theory is replaced by an approach of cognitive
development which is analogous to overlapping waves within a non-linear
dynamic system (Siegler, 1999). In such a system, at any point in time
and at any age, different strategies with different degrees of
complexity and sophistication might be in conflict in the brain.
According to this theoretical framework, the progressive ability of the
prefrontal cortex to inhibit irrelevant or misleading strategies to
activate the most logical one sustains the conceptual development of
children and the shift from one Piagetian stage to the next (Houdé and
Borst, 2014). This constitutes the central assumption of our new
neo-Piagetian theory of reasoning development."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.