Process and Object in Contemporary Philosophy. Edited by Roland Faber and Andrew Goffey (NY: Bloomsbury, 2014). Available free here. Bryant's updated version of "Time of the object" is chapter 4. Also recall this brief FB thread on it. The comments therefrom:
Seems he added sections of Democracy of Objects to this paper. Relating to the Captain Metaphysics comic, I like this:
"What
Derrida articulates in this passage is a variation of Aristotle’s
concept of primary substances; for the very being of primary substance
is to exceed and be detachable from every context. Hence,
in the case of New Historicism which strives to reduce an articulation
to its context, we encounter a sort of transcendental illusion where the
historicist is not discovering the contexture of relations that gave
the work meaning, but rather creating a contexture, a regime of
attraction, that generates meaning as an effect. It is for this reason
that I refer to substance under the title of presence as local
manifestation, for the manifestation of any substance is a function of
its contingent context, such that every substance, in principle, harbors
the power of falling into other contexts and thereby of manifesting
itself otherwise than it does in this context. [...] Derrida’s account
of time and différance gives us one way of providing a formal
ontological demonstration for the thesis that substances are withdrawn"
(89-90).
And the conclusion, a variation on Edwards' syntegrity:
"Derrida
argues that we must abandon the thesis that the synthesis of time is
accomplished by a preexistent transcendental identity or unity that
affects the synthesis of traces of the past. Rather,
we must see the unity and identity of the substance as arising from the
interplay of these traces and differences themselves. The
substantiality of substance must, like Whitehead’s 'societies,' be seen
as that which perpetually produces itself from itself without a
homunculus presiding over the synthesis of these differences. In this
regard, the substantiality of substance, its identity and unity, would
not be an identity and unity that precedes this synthesis, but would be
the very
activity of synthesis itself. It is precisely
an account of a decentralized process of synthesis in autopoietic and
allopoietic machines that Luhmann gives us" (90).
A
lot of discussion of Derrida in the Captain Metaphysics comic thread,
but there's a lot of material in this thread that responds to it that
goes way beyond a kennilingus (purely relativistic) MGM orientation and
situates him smack dab inside an IPS, withdrawn
warts and all. Plus there is always reconstruction with every
deconstruction (aka de/re) via his notion of iteration, something Bryant
discusses without using that word.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.