See this article in Philosophical Psychology, 30:7, 2017. The abstract:
"From our everyday commuting to the gold medalist’s world-class
performance, skillful actions are characterized by fine-grained, online
agentive control. What is the proper explanation of such control? There
are two traditional candidates: intellectualism explains skillful
agentive control by reference to the agent’s propositional mental
states; anti-intellectualism holds that propositional mental states or
reflective processes are unnecessary since skillful action
is fully accounted for by automatic coping processes. I examine the
evidence for three psychological phenomena recently held to support
anti-intellectualism (choking under pressure, expertise-induced amnesia,
and expert confabulation) and argue that it supports neither
traditional candidate, but an intermediate attention-control account,
according to which the top-down, intention-directed control of attention
is a necessary component of skillful action. Only this account recognizes both the role of automatic control in skilled action and the
need for higher-order cognition to thread automatic processes together
into a unified, skillful performance. This applies to bodily skillful
action in general, from the world-class performance of experts to
mundane, habitual action. The attention-control account stresses that,
for intentions to play their role as top-down modulators of attention,
agents must sustain the intention’s activation; hence, the need for
reflecting throughout performance."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.