Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, postmetaphysics, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Who decides what Wilber means?
Continuing from this post, who
decides what Wilber means? Or Adi Da? Just themselves? LP's suggestion
implies that we can take their stated meaning at face value, that they
know well the full extent of their meaning, and that we do not. So we
must be careful in interpreting what they say but they do not because
they have privileged access we lack due to Supermind? This guy I know
explored this question 10 years ago and it still stands the test of
time. In Wilber's own words, the problem arises when a theory tries "to
make its context the only context worth serious consideration" (p. 113).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.