No evidence of terrorism in countries included in the ban

Continuing with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision (linked in the last post), contrary to Twampler's lies about the necessity of the ban due to security issues the Court said:

"The Government has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in the Order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the Executive Order, the Government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree, as explained above" (26-27).

In other words, Twampler doesn't feel the need to provide facts to support his ban because as King he is beyond question. Wrong! Sad! Loser!

Meanwhile, shortly thereafter in the decision the Court notes that the States "have offered ample evidence" to support their case. Fortunately, still being a democracy, one still needs to provide evidence in support of an argument. It Twampler has his way not so much.