Following up on this post. Just listening to the first few minutes where Harris discusses his previous
encounter with Dennett on the topic when things got uncivil, to say the
least. Harris wonders if dialog can ever really happen, since we often
end up vociferously and often disingenuously defending our steadfast
positions instead of mutually learning from each other. I must admit
that's pretty much how I've come to view dialog these days unless its
within a mutually shared worldview. Even then it can be a challenge.
After listening to about 20 minutes I must say, what's the fucking
point? All this philosophical gibberish is useless to the dire political
circumstances under which most people live in this world. And such
discussion does absolutely nothing to ameliorate such conditions, much
less even address them. What does such fine philosophical parsing have
to do with anything other than maintaining one's position and standing
in an intellectually effete profession?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.