See this page for both. See the difference?
"Hillary Clinton proposes raising taxes on high-income taxpayers,
modifying taxation of multinational corporations, repealing fossil fuel
tax incentives, and increasing estate and gift taxes. Her proposals
would increase revenue by $1.1 trillion over the next decade. Nearly all
of the tax increases would fall on the top 1 percent; the bottom 95
percent of taxpayers would see little or no change in their taxes.
Marginal tax rates would increase, reducing incentives to work, save,
and invest, and the tax code would become more complex. The analysis
does not address a forthcoming proposal to cut taxes for low- and
middle-income families."
And now Trump's:
"His [Trump's] plan would significantly reduce marginal tax rates on individuals
and businesses, increase standard deduction amounts to nearly four times
current levels, and curtail many tax expenditures.His proposal would
cut taxes at all income levels, although the largest benefits, in dollar
and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households. The
plan would reduce federal revenues by $9.5 trillion over its first
decade before accounting for added interest costs or considering
macroeconomic feedback effects. The plan would improve incentives to
work, save, and invest. However, unless it is accompanied by very large
spending cuts, it could increase the national debt by nearly 80 percent
of gross domestic product by 2036, offsetting some or all of the
incentive effects of the tax cuts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.