See this Ph.D. thesis on the topic. Amen to this statement in the abstract, not typical of kennilingus pomo reductionism:
"Against
the critiques which have been levelled at postmodernism I will argue
that critical realism is theoretically best placed to mediate the
various postmodern positions and concerns
by developing a reading of critical realism which places critical
realism firmly within the context of postmodernism as an alternate
postmodernism. Yet if critical realism can be understood within
postmodernism, postmodernism can equally be understood within a more
encompassing, more mediated realism."
Being
a Derrigaga, I was impressed with Chapter 2 wherein the author supports
Derrida as a critical realist, not the relativistic boogeyman of
kennilingus. In fact, from p. 89: "That is to say, différance cannot be
contained or articulated within language but operates as the hidden domain of the real."
Reminds me a lot of Bryant's analysis of Derrida in "Time of the Object."
Just
perusing a couple of sections on metaphor, and its necessity and
inescapability, the thesis could have been 'fleshed out' on this with
Lakoff & Johnson's Philosophy in the Flesh. Alas, they and their
ideas on the matter were not referenced.
Chapter 4.3 on hauntology reminds me of this Caputo analysis:
"Žižek
provocatively suggests an odd kind of 'positive' unbelief in an undead
God, like the 'undead' in the novels of Stephen King, a 'spectral'
belief that is never simple disbelief along
with a God who is never simply dead (101). God is dead but we continue
to (un)believe in the ghost of god, in a living dead god. If atheism ("I
don't believe in God") is the negation of belief ("I believe in God"),
what is the negation of that negation? It is not a higher living spirit
of faith that reconciles belief and unbelief but a negation deeper than a
simple naturalistic and reactionary atheism (like Hitchins and
Dawkins). Belief is not aufgehoben but rather not quite killed off, even
though it is dead. It is muted, erased but surviving under erasure,
like seeing Marley's ghost even though Scrooge knows he is dead these
twenty years; like a crossed out letter we can still read, oddly living
on in a kind of spectral condition. Things are neither black nor white
but shifting, spectral, incomplete. We have bid farewell to God, adieu
to the good old God (à Dieu), farewell to the Big Other, Who Makes
Everything Turn Out Right, Who Writes Straight with Crooked Lines, who
maketh me to lie down in green pastures. Still, that negation of
negation does not spell the simple death of belief but its positive mode
in which belief, while dead, lives on (sur/vivre). This unbelief would
be the 'pure form' of belief, and if belief is the substance of the
things that appear not, Žižek proposes a belief deprived of substance as
well as of appearance. Žižek mocks Derrida mercilessly, but when
spaceship Žižek finally lands, when this buzzing flutterbug named Žižek
finally alights, one has to ask, exactly how far has he landed from
Derrida's 'spectral messianic.'"
This idea led me to write a poem using a bastardized form of haiku that I call haikukachoo:
I see a ghost on the horizon
calling me to follow.
When I get there
loose rags on a tattered fence.
I look up and he's still there
on the horizon, beckoning.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.