Constructivist Foundations, 11(2), 3/15/16

At this link:

Constructivist Foundations 11(2)

Exploring the Diversity within Enactivism and Neurophenomenology

Edited by Tom Froese, Sebastjan Vörös & Alexander Riegler

Editorial

Sebastjan Vörös, Tom Froese & Alexander Riegler

Epistemological Odyssey: Introduction to Special Issue on the Diversity of Enactivism and Neurophenomenology

Target Article

Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward

Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn

Open Peer Commentaries

Humberto R. Maturana

Confusion of Reflective Domains?

Shigeru Taguchi

Can the Lived Experience of Living Beings Be Approached through Inference?

Paulo De Jesus

Sweeping Anthropomorphism Under the MAT

Jean-Luc Petit

Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being?

Peter Gaitsch

Modern Anthropomorphism and Phenomenological Method

Steve Torrance

Varela’s Sixth Step: Teleology and the Re-Visioning of Science

Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen & Matthew Isaac Harvey

Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity

Jérôme Proulx

Living (in) Different Enactivist Worlds: A Mathematics Education Researcher’s Point of View on Enactivism

Authors’ Response

Dave Ward & Mario Villalobos

Enactivism, Cognitive Science, and the Jonasian Inference

Target Article

Matthew Isaac Harvey, Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen & Sune Vork Steffensen

Interactivity and Enaction in Human Cognition

Open Peer Commentaries

Fred Cummins

Enaction, and Its Relation to Science in an Objective Key

Tom Froese

Interactivity Should Aim to Extend, Not Reject, the Conceptual Foundations of Enaction

Nathaniel F. Barrett

What Is at Stake in the Disagreement Between Interactivity and Enaction?

Robert Lowe

The Role of Allostasis in Sense-Making: A Better Fit for Interactivity than Cybernetic-Enactivism?

Authors’ Response

Matthew Isaac Harvey, Rasmus Gahrn-Andersen & Sune Vork Steffensen

Explanatory Pluralism and Precise Conceptual Development

Target Article

Michael Beaton

Sensorimotor Direct Realism: How We Enact Our World

Open Peer Commentaries

John Stewart

Realities in the Plural

John Pickering

Who is “We”? Some Observations on Sensorimotor Direct Realism

Hugh Gash

The Epistemological Dance: Difference, Experience and Representation

David Silverman

Representationalism and the Sensorimotor Theory

John Mark Bishop

Phenomenal Promiscuity

Bryony Pierce

The Role of External Objects in Perceptual Experience

Matteo Mossio

How Far Can Sensorimotor Direct Realism Go?

Author’s Response

Michael Beaton

The Personal Level in Sensorimotor Theory

Target Article

Martin Flament Fultot, Lin Nie & Claudia Carello

Perception-Action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction

Open Peer Commentaries

Dobromir Dotov

Perception-Action Mutuality Does Not Obviate Emergence or the Animal’s Active Role in the Perceptual Act

Manuel Heras-Escribano

Embracing the Environment: Ecological Answers for Enactive Problems

Marek McGann

Enactivism and Ecological Psychology: Divided by Common Ground

Andrea Schiavio

Enactive affordances and the interplay of biological and phenomenological subjectivity

Konrad Werner

Presentation of the World: Gibson and Husserl on the Interplay between the Objective and the Subjective

Karim Zahidi & Jan Van Eemeren

Radical Enactivism and Ecological Psychology: Friends or Foes?

Peter Anthony Cariani

Learning of New Percept-Action Mappings Is a Constructive Process of Goal-Directed Self-Modification

Mog Stapleton

Enactivism Embraces Ecological Psychology

Ezequiel A. Di Paolo

Across the Uncanny Valley: The Ecological, the Enactive, and the Strangely Familiar

Tehran J. Davis & Michael T. Turvey

One World, Multiple Organisms: Specificity /Autocatakinetics versus Enactivism/Autopoiesis

Manuel de Pinedo

The Ontology of Perception: Agency, Evolution and Representationalism

Authors’ Response

Martin Flament Fultot, Lin Nie & Claudia Carello

Complementarity of Symmetry and Asymmetry

Target Article

Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto

Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness

Open Peer Commentaries

Michel Bitbol & Elena Antonova

On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology

Diana Gasparyan

Not to Avoid But Legitimize: Why the Gap Could Be Natural For the Enactive World

Ximena A. González-Grandón

The Gap Or Not The Gap: Is That The Neurophenomenological Question?

Dan Lloyd

Not-Quite-So Radical Enactivism

Shaun Gallagher

Identity or Dynamic Structure?

Michael Beaton

Crossing the Explanatory Gap by Legwork, not by Fiat

Oliver Lukitsch & Cornell Schreiber

Down the “Preferred Path”: Dispositional Flexibility Constitutes Phenomenal Character

Katsunori Miyahara

Missing Out On the Radicalism of Neurophenomenology?

Authors’ Response

Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto

Mind Never The Gap, Redux

Target Article

Urban Kordeš

Going Beyond Theory: Constructivism and Empirical Phenomenology

Open Peer Commentaries

Olga Markič

In Search of a Remedy

Toma Strle

On the Necessity of Foundations, Intersubjectivity and Cognitive Science

Davood G. Gozli

Phenomenology as Critique, Discovery, and Justification

Pierre Vermersch

Notes on the Coupling between the Observer and the Observed in Psycho-Phenomenology

Hanne De Jaegher

Intersubjectivity in the Study of Experience

Pierre Steiner

The Many Faces of Experience

Martin Flament Fultot

What Kind of Epistemic Activity is Expert Introspection?

Véronique Havelange

Constitution: Epistemological and Ontological

Author’s Response

Urban Kordeš

Persevering with the Non-Trivial

Target Article

Elizaveta Solomonova & Xin Wei Sha

Exploring the Depth of Dream Experience: The Enactive Framework and Methods for Neurophenomenological Research

Open Peer Commentaries

Juan C. González

Blurring the Differences between the Dream, Perceptual and Hallucinatory Experiences Is Not the Answer

Etienne B. Roesch

In Search of a New Looking Glass: Cognitive Science Is Not Dead, It Is Just Asleep

Michael D. Kirchhoff

Dreaming: Ontological and Methodological Considerations

Urban Kordeš

Dreams: An Experimental Laboratory of Phenomenology

Ralph D. Ellis

Enactive Consciousness and Gendlin’s Dream Analysis

Alejandra Rosales-Lagarde

Neurophenomenology’s Epistemological Locus and the Need to Consider Its Primitive Sources: Internal Processing and Development

Jennifer M. Windt

We Need to Go Deeper! Conceptual and Methodological Considerations on the Depth of Dream Experience

Authors’ Response

Elizaveta Solomonova & Xin Wei Sha

Towards a Neurophenomenology of Embodied, Skillful Dreaming