See it here. He would benefit from reading our IPS discussion on the topic as follows: part one, part two. A few excerpts from Stein:
"[O]nce we know more about capitalism, if we want to be true to the
principles of integral meta-theories, especially Wilber, Habermas, and
Bhaskar, integral practitioners should be explicitly and actively
anti-capitalist or trans-capitalist. Thus, revolutionary praxis, or totalizing depth praxis—integral
activism aimed at replacing capitalism with a new economic
system—should be one of the goals of the integral movement, perhaps its
most important goal."
"It is exactly this taken-for-grantedness that should have us alert to
the ways our own thinking can simply reproduce the very systems it
claims to be “transcending but including ”—as so many integral
practitioners claim to be doing with capitalism. But what does this
mean? That we aspire to have an integral capitalism, or to transcend but
include capitalism? Does one have integral forms of slavery, or aspire
to transcend but include feudalism? No. We negate these forms, but
preserve important lessons. (“To negate and preserve” is another
formulation of the Hegelian dialectic summarized often as “transcend but
include.”) So it should be with capitalism. Integral meta-theory might
harvest the seeds of tomorrow in some of capitalisms distributed
networks and organizational and technological modalities. Yet it must
nevertheless articulate a future in which, to continue with our example,
individuals are free from the compulsion to be exploited by selling
their body into the wage labor system."
"So yes, I do believe a commitment to integral meta-theory entails a
commitment to the disruption and ultimate overthrow of capitalism. We
need to work out an integral diagnostic critique if capitalism,
leavening integral theory with the best of the non-reductive Marxists
(or Integral Theorists could actually read Bhaskar’s Dialectic). We also need to engage in projects that articulate and exemplify real alternatives, integral concrete utopian[4]
futures for economic and productive systems, as well as new forms of
organizational governance and cooperative structures. So what this looks
like on the ground is a longer story…"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.