I
came upon this Michel Bitbol talk on 'pure experience.' It goes along
with Thompson's section on the primacy of consciousness in this
post. But are they the same, different, or some combination? There are
also some suggested readings in the description below the video. One of those references is Bitbol's paper "Is consciousness primary?" The abstract:
"Six
arguments against the view that conscious experience derives from a
material basis are reviewed. These arguments arise from epistemology,
phenomenology, neuropsychology, and philosophy of quantum mechanics. It
turns out that any attempt at proving that conscious experience is
ontologically secondary to material objects both fails and brings
out its methodological and existential primacy. No
alternative metaphysical view is espoused (not even a variety
of Spinoza’s attractive double-aspect theory). Instead, an
alternative stance, inspired from F. Varela’s neurophenomenology, is
advocated."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.