Is the title of a recently published e-book by Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Here's an excerpt from the introductory editorial.
"The biological basis of physiological signals is incredibly complex.
While many researches certainly appreciate molecular, cellular and
systems approaches to unravel overall biological complexity, in the
recent decades the interest for mathematical and computational
characterization of structural and functional basis underlying
biological phenomena gain wide popularity among scientists.[...] We witnessed wide range applications of nonlinear quantitative analysis
that produced measures such as fractal dimension, power law scaling,
Hurst exponent, Lyapunov exponent, approximate entropy, sample entropy,
Lempel–Ziv complexity as well as other metric. [...] Also there is another more theoretical challenge of contemporary
nonlinear signal measurements, especially including fractal-based
methods. The question of choosing the right method and its possible
adjustment in order for the results of the analysis to be as accurate as
possible is the persistent problem.[...] We seek to bring together the recent practical and theoretical advances
in the development and application of nonlinear methods or narrower
fractal-based methods for characterizing the complex physiological
systems at multiple levels of organization. [...] A comprehensive understanding of advantages and disadvantages of each
method, especially between its mathematical assumptions and real-world
applicability, can help to find out what is at stake regarding the above
aims and to direct us toward more fruitful application of nonlinear
measures and statistics in physiology and biology in general."
Excerpts from this article in the ebook, "Measures and metrics of biological signals."
"With the growing complexity of the applied mathematical concepts, we are
approaching some serious issues of foundations of Mathematics. Before that, let us mention that the symbol ∞ does not represent
infinity uniquely since Cantor's discoveries in 1873, when he showed
that arithmetical and geometric infinity, i.e., natural numbers and real
line are different infinite quantities. As a consequence, infinity has
been scaled in terms of pairwise different cardinal numbers. However,
the size of this scale is enormous; it cannot be coded by any set. This
was the creation of Set theory, and the beginning of the studies of
foundations of Mathematics, which is probably never ending."
"We learned that Mathematical theories, packed around their axioms can be
at the same level of logical certainty, while obviously impossible
mixed together since with colliding axioms.[...] Let us just say that AC (Axiom of Choice) is very much needed in the foundations of Mathematics, but there are alternatives. [...] Some of the functions close to the above-examined fractals are complex enough to open the fundamental issue. [...] On the other hand, we can stay on the flat Earth and deal only with
short approximation of the phenomena, avoiding entering the zone of the
complex Mathematics and its fundamental issues. Yet, as proved by
Goedel, we cannot escape the hot issues even remaining only in
Arithmetic, nor in any theory containing its copy (like Geometry)."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.