Continuing this post, we
can also conceptualize container schema differently, i.e., where a
so-called smaller holon is not subsumed in a larger one but in which
they share a space-between as Edwards calls it. It offers an entirely
different approach to hierarchy because the interacting holons retain
their autonomy. They structurally couple and create another holon
altogether instead of one being subsumed or nested in the other.
This
is especially significant when you take into account basic categories,
which are in the middle of typical taxonomic hierarchies. That is, a
hierarchy does not start with the most particular type which is subsumed
into the most general type. Those two abstract ends of the spectrum are
literally tied together by the basic category in the middle, the most
concrete and thus the most closely interactive with the world. Hence
this hierarchy is in effect from the middle up and down so that the very
nature of hierarchy is entirely different than the typical one. Hence
hier(an)archical synplexity.
I discussed this at length and in depth in both the states/stages and real/false reason Ning threads.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.