Starting around 21:20 Zak
talks about how social media has trained us to communicate
strategically, i.e. coercive to an agenda instead of for mutual
understanding. While I appreciate his analysis that the latter is the
ideal we should strive for, given the former is rampant and the ground
on which political battles are waged and won, I have based my own
approach on such strategic communication. I don't see how mutual
understanding can be reached with Twitler and his fascists, nor with the
majority of the current Repugnantan Party (strategic insults) who
support that fascism, so I fight the war strategically on that ground.
However,
there are increasingly more principled Republicans who also see Twit's
fascism and how it's destroyed their once proud Party which now enables
him. They are doing a great job at articulating both the negatives of
Twit and the positives of their core values that have been degraded by
him and the Party enablers. I certainly can find ground for mutual
understanding with them to hopefully return our politics to some
semblance of open debate and mutual understanding.
But
the first order of business for me is defeating that fascism and
whatever that takes down and dirty in the trenches of strategic framing.
I know and understand how those who favor the ideal of mutual
understanding can interpret what I'm doing as cancel culture. And I
agree: I want to cancel fascism at the ballot box, for if it continues
we may lose the right of that ballot box.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.