In
Thompson's paper "Dreamless sleep, the embodied mind and consciousness," one study measured experienced Theravadan and Tibetan
meditators during deep, slow-wave sleep and found they had 20-25% higher
incidence of gamma wave activity in the parietal-occipital region. So
this sort of gamma wave activity is not limited to Tibetan style
meditation, since both styles include both concentrative and receptive
meditations.
This
study discussed these two kinds of meditation,
calling them focused or distributed. It noted that both types in
Theravada produced more the relaxation response, whereas both types in
the Tibetan produced more the arousal response. They suggest that it
therefore behooves us to not use the focused (concentrative) and
distributed (receptive) categories in this research, since both styles
were studied from each tradition. They further suggest that the relaxed
and arousal categories are more indicative of the two traditions.
Which
may speak more to the emphasis of the traditions. The initial post
study (at least the abstract, don't have the actual study) didn't talk
in terms of gamma and alpha waves but in terms of parasympathetic
(relaxation) and sympathetic (arousal) responses. Granted there are more
alpha waves in the former and more gamma waves in the latter. But
again, this may indicate the different emphasis of the traditions
instead of supposing that more gamma waves in itself is somehow
'better.' Recall that concentrative practices tend to elicit more of the
ego ideal, which often leads to metaphysical interpretations. In this case Epstein refers to the Tibetan concentrative practices and not the Theravada concentrative practices.
And
don't forget the study Thompson cited, which is also new and notes both
traditions produce gamma waves in deep sleep. Thompson noted that
producing gamma waves in the deep sleep is the result of doing
meditative practices while not sleeping of the type that induces
consciousness without an object. Both Theravada and Tibetan practices
accomplish this. So again, this may be more a traditional emphasis. It
seems a lot more study is needed to ascertain the postmetaphyiscal
meaning of the neuroscientific data. Especially since laughing also produces gamma waves, and that requires just a sense of humor and no
special meditative skill. Lots of folks laugh a lot and have not in the
least developed brain synchrony or higher abstract functions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.