Another of Montuori's examples I appreciated is a learning
environment of peers that are not afraid to put out tentative ideas and
work together to develop them. It sounded a lot like what we do at IPS.
Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, postmetaphysics, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Montuori on education today
See this
recent Montuori Integral World article on his perception of academia today. One
aspect highlighted therein we discussed in the IPS Quacademics thread is how collegiate scholars
are out to make a name, to discern themselves as creating a unique
contribution. Hence it reinforces the notion of a self-made person based
solely on their own merits while deemphasizing or ignoring the societal
and cultural shoulders on which one stands. It's an imbalance of
autonomy and knowledge ownership in distinction with open, peer to peer
knowledge generation. Sure, there can be a balance of autonomous
individuals within the P2P paradigm, but that seems the exception rather
than the rule in current academia. There are signs of change though as
noted in Rifkin's chapter 7, for example.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.