Lovelock is a more than a bit loose with the facts

Following up on this post, see this Lovelock book review. I thought Lovelock's ideas in the linked article were more than a bit off. The Guardian review reinforced my intuitions, especially this one:

"James appears to possess a profound and irrational prejudice against renewable energy. This seems to encourage him to believe almost any rubbish its opponents publish."

Which the author then, unlike Lovelock, provides some examples with legitimate evidence.