You can see their latest offering of free e-books here. This one looks of particular interest to me: Insight and Intuition - Two sides of the Same Coin? Their blurb:
In the field of intuition it is widely accepted that problem solving
proceeds in a more or less graded fashion from problem formulation to
problem solution as previously encoded information is activated by clues
to coherence. The resulting pattern of activation differentially
sensitizes a person to new information that is pertinent for the
solution. Eventually, the continuous (and rapid) build-up of coherent
information is sufficient to cross a threshold of awareness or noticing.
Accordingly, implicitly acquired knowledge and experience play an
important role because their content is assumed to be non-consciously
and gradually activated in memory from clues in the environment that
initiate an automatic spreading of activation. These assumptions are
summarized in what has been known as the continuity model of intuition.
On the contrary, the current literature on insight problem
solving favors a discontinuity model. Particularly, insight is linked
to processes that restructure the mental representation of a problem. It
is assumed that prior knowledge and inappropriate assumptions result in
self-imposed constraints that establish a biased representation of the
problem and thus prevent a solution. Consequently, a discontinuity model
suggests the first intuitive apprehension of the problem to lead to an
impasse and has to be overcome by relaxing these constraints to find a
solution.
Until now, there has neither been theoretical
discussion nor empirical investigation on the continuity/discontinuity
distinction. Our open research questions include the following:
1.
Are continuity/discontinuity different sides of the same coin
distinguishing different stages within a continuous solution process, or
do they stand for mutual exclusive processes?
2. If intuition is
seen as “coherence building mechanism”, is it conceivable to describe
the different stages within insight problem solving as coherence
changing processes?
3. What are the underlying neuro-cognitive
mechanisms that allow the search for coherence, respectively the change
of coherence (representational change)? Both processes might go beyond a
simple spreading activation account.
4. How does re-combination and the generation of new and novel solutions fit into the intuitive framework?
5. Could the application of Darwinian principles help to inform us about the underlying principles of both?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.