We tend to focus on the advanced stages of human development with
the hope that we as a human race can all have opportunities for such
development. But how do we get there from here? It seems that we need to
first address and meet the needs of those of us on the lower
developmental stages in order to open up opportunities for higher
development. It's pretty hard if not impossible to get involved in
self-actualization practices when we don't have enough financial
resources to eat, pay rent and bills, get a good basic education etc. If
we are to accept developmental theory we know those needs need to be
satisfied before we can even imagine the farther reaches of development.
One
way to provide for those basic needs is through good government that
creates legal policy designed to meet them, like a living wage,
healthcare for all, worker's rights etc. So we need to vote in
politicians that will authentically implement such policies, politicians
that are themselves further along on the developmental trajectory, even
if not so-called metamodern, integral, whatever. That requires that we
talk to the majority of voters about issues of importance to them, not
necessarily of importance to us. We have to win elections in the first
place to provide such opportunities. Yes, talking about the farther
reaches of development in our insular communities is a necessary good
for setting future attractors, but one thing we've learned in the US at
least is that the majority of working people find such highfalutin talk
to be of the very elite class they don't connect with and voted against.
Along those lines, this highfalutin professor, Joan Williams, notes that the liberal elite tend to focus on self development and social issues instead of working class issues like a good job, healthcare and education. Working class people are more concerned about the end of the month, not the end of the world, hence economic populism should be our main selling point. We also need to frame those policies in working class language, so that's one difference between Sanders and Warren: The former does exactly that, the latter comes off as more professorial which doesn't connect as well with workers. That is born out by the majority of contributions to each of the candidates: Bernie gets more from the working class, Warren more from liberal elites.
Along those lines, this highfalutin professor, Joan Williams, notes that the liberal elite tend to focus on self development and social issues instead of working class issues like a good job, healthcare and education. Working class people are more concerned about the end of the month, not the end of the world, hence economic populism should be our main selling point. We also need to frame those policies in working class language, so that's one difference between Sanders and Warren: The former does exactly that, the latter comes off as more professorial which doesn't connect as well with workers. That is born out by the majority of contributions to each of the candidates: Bernie gets more from the working class, Warren more from liberal elites.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.