The abstract of the above article:
"The social benefits of interpersonal synchrony are widely recognized.
Yet, little is known about its impact on the self. According to enactive
cognitive science, the human self for its stability and regulation
needs to balance social attunement with disengagement from others. Too
much interpersonal synchrony is considered detrimental for a person’s
ability to self-regulate. In this study, 66 adults took part in the
Body-Conversation Task (BCT), a dyadic movement task promoting
spontaneous social interaction. Using whole-body behavioural imaging, we
investigated the simultaneous impact of interpersonal synchrony
(between persons) and intrapersonal synchrony (within a person) on
positive affect and self-regulation of affect. We hypothesized that
interpersonal synchrony’s known tendency to increase positive affect
would have a trade-off, decreasing a person’s ability to self-regulate
affect. Interpersonal synchrony predicted an increase in positive
affect. Consistent with our hypothesis, it simultaneously predicted a
weakening in self-regulation of affect. Intrapersonal synchrony,
however, tended to oppose these effects. Our findings challenge the
widespread belief that harmony with others has only beneficial effects,
pointing to the need to better understand the impact of interaction
dynamics on the stability and regulation of the human self."
The conclusion:
"There is much evidence supporting the claim that a lack of social engagement has a negative impact on our well-being.
The novelty of our outcomes consists in showing that too much social
attunement, however, may also become a risk for the self. Openness to
and harmony with others is not all we need for stability. We need to
balance our reliance on others with separation and independence from
them. [...] Our findings have crucial implications for the way we conceive of the
human self and its relation to the social world. Humans are indeed no
islands: the self is a thoroughly social entity. Yet, it is not as
simple as that. In this study we have provided evidence that even at the
basic level of spontaneous movement interactions, we also need
disengagement and separation from others in order to self-regulate and
maintain our stability."
So it seems we need to
differentiate from our crowd via self-regulation of affect to develop
our individuality. But we can also get stuck in that self(ish) and
become isolated and inflated. It seems the next stage is for
semi-autonomous individuals to re-socialize with others through
interdependence. Once again it seems about boundaries, how they both
separate and connect, singular/plurality.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.