"All
this is to say that German conservatives did not see Hitler as Hitler —
they saw Hitler as Trump. And the reasons they devised to overcome
their qualms and accept him as the head of the government would ring
familiar to followers of the 2016 campaign. They believed the
responsibility of governing would tame Hitler, and that his beliefs were
amorphous and could be shaped by advisers once in office. They
respected his populist appeal and believed it could serve their own
ends. [...] Their myopic concern with specifics of their
policy agenda overcame their general sense of unease. [...] Think of the supply-siders
supporting Trump in the hope he can enact major tax cuts, or the social
conservatives enthused about his list of potential judges, and you’ll
have a picture of the thought process."
"That reality is stark. Trump’s admiration
for ironfisted dictators, not only in Ba’athist Iraq but Russia, China,
and North Korea, is the ideological lodestar of his long history of
political musings. Over the years, Trump has weaved left and right on
health care, abortion, taxes, and even the issues currently central to
his campaign, like immigration and trade, but has never wavered from his
foundational belief that strong leaders are those who crush their
enemies without restraint. Whatever norms or bounds that we think limit
the damage a president could inflict are likely to be exceeded if that
president is Trump. Those Republicans who publicly endorse Trump because
he probably won’t win may be making an error on a historic scale."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.