Corporate pubic corruption is here. The abstract:
"Defining corruption as the exercise of public power for private, selfish
ends, many theorists have argued that individuals can be corrupt even
if their actions are legal. This essay explores the knotty question of
when legal corporate action is corrupt. It argues that when corporations
exercise public power, either through monopolistic control of a market
or through campaign contributions and support of governmental actors,
they are subject to the same responsibilities of anyone who exercises
public power. Therefore, as a theoretical matter, we should call
corporations corrupt when they exercise public power selfishly, in a way
that puts their own interests over the public’s interests. Because they
make legal corporate corruption less likely, global anticorruption
campaigns should therefore emphasize antimonopoly laws and campaign
finance laws."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.