See this story. From the Executive Summary:
“Traditionally, a commons is a natural resource that gives rise to
the problem of collective action: Individuals who act alone without
consideration for others will arrive at outcomes that are bad for all.
Pioneering research by Elinor Ostrom, a scholar of economic governance,
has revealed that the claimants to a common pool resource are sometimes
able to organize themselves to manage the commons on a day-today basis
and to adapt to changing circumstances. In this paper, the authors study
the dynamics of a commons organization: In 2006-2007, the Manchester
City Council created a commons organization to design a number of new
school buildings. The Council had broad decision rights over school
design and construction, but rather than delegating those rights to its
own staff or to a joint venture, as were the typical practices, the
Council gave each school co-equal rights to approve the design so that
no building project could go forward unless signed off by both the
school and the Council staff. As such, the Council converted the
decision-making process from a controlled, centralized style to a
commons-based approach. Using the principles of Ostrom’s commons theory
the authors show that, overall, the commons form of organizing brought
with it concomitant risk. This risk, however, was significantly lessened
through the creation of a robust commons organization."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.