Continuing this post,
I don't care for Stein's descriptions of modernism, postmodernism and
metamodernism. The last is sooo transcend and include, but where is the
"negate and preserve" he talked about in this piece? Not everything is
included, and mutual understanding is not always the goal when something
like a defunct worldview is to be negated instead of bargained with. He
was quite clear about that when it came to capitalism but in this talk
so far (I'm only 20 minutes in) the sweetness and light of mutual
(meta)understanding is cloying my taste buds.
Update: He describes as time goes on (25+ minutes) via his critique
(negation) of earlier educational approaches and how they're better
under metamodernism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.