Continuing from this post.
According to Indian yogic tradition, there are three aspects to
consciousness: awareness, its sensory and mental contents, and how we
identify as a self in relation to the foregoing. The self is a process,
not a static entity. It changes depending on our awareness. It is
different when awake, falling asleep, dreaming or meditating. Thompson
uses the yogic tradition to frame how the above interact.
Meditation comes in two varieties: one-pointed focus and open
allowing. Both train the mind to pay attention to momentary fluctuations
on contents to get below them to what is called 'pure awareness,' which
doesn't identify with any of them. By studying those highly trained in
meditation Thompson's goal it to match precise differences in
phenomenological descriptions of the different states of awareness and
perceptions of self with neuroscientific study.
He then provides an overview of the upcoming chapters. Ch. 1
investigates the nature of consciousness as light or luminosity, and how
it manifests in the waking, dreaming, deep sleep and pure awareness
states. Ch. 2 focuses on the waking state, how the stream of
consciousness is make up of discrete moments depending on shifts in
attention, as well as a more slowly changing sense of self that shifts
during waking, dreaming and deep sleep. Ch. 3 explores whether pure
awareness requires or can transcend a brain. Thompson sees no scientific
evidence of the latter, yet doesn't think said consciousness can be
completely reduced to materialism, given the impossibility of stepping
outside its primacy. Here however he reveals that “fundamental physical
phenomenon” are “essentially nonexperiential” (xxxv), with which I
strongly disagree given object-oriented ontology, dynamic systems theory
and other paradigms. I guess it depends on how we define experience and
awareness, to be pursued further when we get to that chapter.
Chs. 4, 5 and 6 are on falling asleep, dreaming and lucid dreaming,
and how the sense of self changes withing them. Each of these states has
distinct brain activity. Ch. 7 looks at out-of-body experiences. While
one perceives their self locus outside the physical body, there is “no
evidence that one can have an experience without without one's
biological body” (xxxvii). Ch. 8 explores whether some type of
consciousness persists in deep, dreamless sleep, with some preliminary
sleep science in support. Ch. 9 is on what happens to consciousness when
we die. He presents studies of experienced meditaters who can
subjectively monitor their consciousness as they die, which has effects
on how quickly the physically body deteriorates thereafter. This though
is far different than the claim about the body turning into a rainbow
body of pure light. It makes sense that if one can slow their breathing,
heart rate, metabolism etc. during mediation while alive one can also
do so as they die, thereby slowing, but not stopping, the degenerative
process. Ch. 10 refutes the notion that the self is an illusion. While
it isn't a permanent or static essence, and is dynamically constructed,
it is not a mere illusion. I look forward to this chapter, especially in
light of the often rancorous debate on free will, detractors assuming the
illusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.