Following up on the last post, after the IN Governor signed similar legislation he backed off, asking his legislature to fix it. He claimed he had no idea that the law implied what it blatantly stated, discrimination against gays. This article though shows that he knew exactly what the law was designed for and signed it anyway. Therein a letter was sent to Rep. Ed DeLaney from 11 law professors expert on the topic, all but one from IN law schools. It stated:
"In our expert opinion, the clear evidence suggests otherwise and
unmistakably demonstrates that the broad language of the proposed state
RFRA will more likely create confusion, conflict, and a wave of
litigation that will threaten the clarity of religious liberty rights in
Indiana while undermining the state’s ability to enforce other
compelling interests. This confusion and conflict will increasingly take
the form of private actors, such as employers, landlords, small
business owners, or corporations, taking the law into their own hands
and acting in ways that violate generally applicable laws on the grounds
that they have a religious justification for doing so. Members of the
public will then be asked to bear the cost of their employer’s, their
landlord’s, their local shopkeeper’s, or a police officer’s private
religious beliefs."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.