Here's the review on the dangers of optimism. He claims that she engages in techno-optimism and avoids the problem of overconsumption. And yet he admits: "I
want to emphasize key points Klein makes that I agree are essential to a
left/progressive analysis of the ecological crises: First-World levels
of consumption are unsustainable." "On Fire makes it clear that there are
no magic wands to wave, no magic bullets to fire." "Klein does not
advocate such [techno-optimism] fundamentalism." And yes, we do need
tech to get it done.
I
also do not see anywhere in GND advocates the notion that it's enough
to solve all problems. It is indeed like the author suggests, that it's a
start with a lot more to come. That the author lays that straw on
advocates of the GND seems far more projection than fact.
After
much huffing and puffing about the dangers of optimism the author then
shows exactly how much Klein empathizes with the suffering caused by
neoliberalism and its extractive destruction. I thought she was being
too rosy and optimistic? Klein is doing anything but "avoiding the
distressing realities of our time."
And then there's the critics who constantly decry her lack of addressing overpopulation, to which she recently replied via Tweet:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.