It seems that the Buddhist notion of not 'reacting,' of observing
initial emotional responses like anger or fear or hate is to let the
charge pass so that one can response with equanimity and 'skillful
means.' But this has been rationalized into accepting a host of
degenerate and unjust behavior, thereby not doing anything constructive
about it. Yes, traditionally Buddhism has compassion for those who have
been treated unjustly, but also those who have committed unjust actions.
For that latter the calming of the so-called negative emotions to
elicit love and compassion seems to have led to not taking appropriate
actions with criminal perpetrators. It's almost a New Age sort of belief
that if we treat such criminals with love and compassion this will
transform them.
Hence the lack of Buddhist political or government or police
involvement, involvement that might use righteous indignation to
motivate actions toward justice on a broader scale, including punishment
of perpetrators up to an including death. I think this might be why
the engaged Buddhism
movement even began. And a part of the evolving dharma? And perhaps
that anger and even hate are not necessarily wrong reactions but can be
also channeled into skillful means?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.