Also note here's Lerner's more recent statement on this issue. Some excerpts:
"The assaults on Bernie Sanders’ presidential candidacy reached new lows
in the past week. Unable to effectively challenge the value of his
policies, the denizens of the status quo have now focused on his alleged
utopianism and his supposedly flawed vision of how change happens. [...] Yet such leaders are only possible if they emerge from and are supported
by larger visionary movements to whom they are accountable. Krugman
wildly underestimates the importance of maximalist demands for peace,
social justice, and environmental sanity, and thereby fails to see the
importance of leaders who urge us to seek a fundamental transformation
of our deeply broken society"
"Yet all of these movements have run up against the most intractable of
all enemies: the global capitalist system. When Krugman and others talk
about being realistic, what they really mean is that they will only
support changes that minimally reform some of the worst excesses of this
system. And what progressives have gradually come to realize is that
such changes are mostly undermined by the dynamics of the global
marketplace, as the endlessly inventive servants of international
finance, globalized corporations, the top one tenth of one percent of
the super-rich, and the 60 billionaires who own more wealth than half
the people on our planet, manage to find new ways to protect their
wealth, promote their worldview, and exploit the resources of the earth
while (unintentionally but inevitably) destroying the Earth."
"It is true that such leaders, including Bernie if he is elected, cannot
expect to find their highest ideals legislated by the Congress likely to
be produced in the gerrymandered Congressional districts of 2016. But
the President could use her or his office to shape public opinion and
build a powerful grass roots movement that could eventually reshape
public discourse in this country. [...] President Obama’s liberal and progressive critics were depressed not
because Obama made compromises in the course of fighting for the ideals
he said he would fight for, but in making those compromises as his
opening position, and then compromising further in order to be 'realistic,' rarely articulating the ideals around which he had built
support during his 2008 campaign."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.