See Michael Greer's article here. A few edited excerpts follow so see it for much more:
"To a very real extent, Hillary Clinton’s faltering presidential
campaign is a perfect microcosm of what Spengler was talking about in
his cold analysis of democracy in extremis. Her entire platform
presupposes that the only policies the United States can follow are
those that have been welded in place since the turn of the millennium:
more government largesse for corporations and the rich, more austerity
for everyone else, more malign neglect for the national infrastructure
and the environment, more wars in the Middle East, and more of the
fantastically stupid policy of confrontation."
"The more likely option just now, I think, is that the Clinton campaign
will meet a crushing defeat at Trump’s hands, and the decline and fall
of Hillary Clinton will also mark the end of the failed consensus that
has dominated American politics for decades. That fact alone doesn’t
guarantee improvement; no law requires that whatever policies replace
the conventional wisdom must be better. Nonetheless, things will change,
and it’s at least possible that some of the changes might remove at
least a few of the worst features of the bleak era now stumbling to its
end around us."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.