"In this article we propose a development of the Dialogical Self Theory by introducing the notions of borders, cogenetic logic and tensegrity. […] We conceptualized the Self as a dynamic semiotic system in constant evolutive tension, rather than a system in equilibrium adapting to the environmental changing conditions. Then, we propose to replace the concept of stability and continuity of the Self with the more fruitful idea of tensional integrity."
Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, postmetaphysics, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
Monday, April 29, 2019
Borders, tensegrity and development in dialogue
Article here and here, Marsico, G., and Tateo, L. (2017). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 536-56.
"In this article we propose a development of the Dialogical Self Theory by introducing the notions of borders, cogenetic logic and tensegrity. […] We conceptualized the Self as a dynamic semiotic system in constant evolutive tension, rather than a system in equilibrium adapting to the environmental changing conditions. Then, we propose to replace the concept of stability and continuity of the Self with the more fruitful idea of tensional integrity."
"In this article we propose a development of the Dialogical Self Theory by introducing the notions of borders, cogenetic logic and tensegrity. […] We conceptualized the Self as a dynamic semiotic system in constant evolutive tension, rather than a system in equilibrium adapting to the environmental changing conditions. Then, we propose to replace the concept of stability and continuity of the Self with the more fruitful idea of tensional integrity."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.