Continuing from this post.
According to Indian yogic tradition, there are three aspects to
consciousness: awareness, its sensory and mental contents, and how we
identify as a self in relation to the foregoing. The self is a process,
not a static entity. It changes depending on our awareness. It is
different when awake, falling asleep, dreaming or meditating. Thompson
uses the yogic tradition to frame how the above interact.
Meditation comes in two varieties: one-pointed focus and open
allowing. Both train the mind to pay attention to momentary fluctuations
on contents to get below them to what is called 'pure awareness,' which
doesn't identify with any of them. By studying those highly trained in
meditation Thompson's goal it to match precise differences in
phenomenological descriptions of the different states of awareness and
perceptions of self with neuroscientific study.
Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, postmetaphysics, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Waking, Dreaming, Being by Evan Thompson
Also check out the ongoing IPS discussion thread on this book.
Foreword by Stephen Batchelor
He begins by noting how the word
meditation has changed in response to the influx of Asiatic religion
into the West, and its countercultural appropriation thereof. It used to
mean reflective thought but now it relates to a spiritual practice,
usually sitting quietly still. Same for the word mindfulness. And yet
the West had tended toward the secularization of this practice,
divorcing it from its religious Buddhist underpinnings. Westerners are
more interested in its practical results in terms of reduced stress, a
more balanced personality, lower blood pressure and so on.
This has also led to Buddhists
reconsidering some of their religious tenets, like reincarnation. Should
it be considered a relic of its religious history? Should westerners
include some of the ethical injunctions from its religious roots? And
what of the scientific study of meditation? Thompson tries to bridge the
gap between first-person accounts of spiritual experiences and how they
manifest in 3rd person scientific studies. Each perspective can learn from and modify the other through 2nd person philosophical dialogue and collaboration.
Prologue
Senator Sanders on the TPP with petition
See his Bernie Buzz on this here for the details. And consider signing the petition here. His introductory preface follows, so see the link for the specifics.
"The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a disastrous trade agreement designed to protect the interests of the largest multi-national corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, the environment and the foundations of American democracy. It will also negatively impact some of the poorest people in the world.
"The TPP is a treaty that has been written behind closed doors by the corporate world. Incredibly, while Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry and major media companies have full knowledge as to what is in this treaty, the American people and members of Congress do not. They have been locked out of the process.
"Further, all Americans, regardless of political ideology, should be opposed to the “fast track” process which would deny Congress the right to amend the treaty and represent their constituents’ interests.
"The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a disastrous trade agreement designed to protect the interests of the largest multi-national corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, the environment and the foundations of American democracy. It will also negatively impact some of the poorest people in the world.
"The TPP is a treaty that has been written behind closed doors by the corporate world. Incredibly, while Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry and major media companies have full knowledge as to what is in this treaty, the American people and members of Congress do not. They have been locked out of the process.
"Further, all Americans, regardless of political ideology, should be opposed to the “fast track” process which would deny Congress the right to amend the treaty and represent their constituents’ interests.
Commons transition platform
The Commons Transition Platform is a database of practical
experiences and policy proposals aimed toward achieving a more humane
and environmentally grounded mode of societal organization. The Commons,
together with Peer to Peer dynamics, represent a third mode of societal
organization that evolves away from the competitive Market State and
obsolete, centrally-planned systems. It is a system based on the
practices and needs of civil society and the environment it inhabits at the local, regional, national and global levels. Premiering January 7th at: www.commonstransition.org
Monday, December 29, 2014
SDSN newsletter
Dear friends,
As 2014 comes to an end we are very glad that the world is making good progress towards adopting a bold sustainable development agenda in 2015. Next year will bring three pivotal conferences on Financing for Development (Addis, July 13-16), Sustainable Development Goals (New York, Sept 25-27), and climate change (Paris, Nov 30-Dec 11). Through our work on indicators and monitoring, Financing for Development, and Deep Decarbonization Pathways, the SDSN supports an ambitious and actionable sustainable development agenda. Our National and Regional SDSNs will support the implementation of the SDGs, and through our education initiative SDSNedu we help train future leaders on sustainable development.
We are grateful for the encouragement, support, and advice we have received from so many of you over the last twelve months. Please don’t hesitate to write to us at info@unsdsn.org if you have questions or suggestions for our work. We also invite you to join the SDSN. More information is available here.
From all of us at the SDSN secretariat, we wish you a peaceful and happy 2015.
Guido Schmidt-Traub
Executive Director
Executive Director
The power of we the people
Robert Reich sums it up on this short video, what we the people have accomplished in the last year, and what further progress we can make. But only if we continue to get involved, speak up, demonstrate, petition etc. We are a powerful force that does make positive change. And we need to see that progress so as not to get discouraged and give up. Keep up the good fight Americans. We are, like our founding fathers and mothers, fighting for our very democracy.
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Introverts are different
See this article for the details. So you extraverts try reading for a change and learn to accept this difference instead of seeing introverts as somehow deficient. Here are the bullet points:
They withdraw in crowds.
Small talk stresses them out, while deeper conversations make them feel alive.
They succeed on stage -- just not in the chit-chat afterwards.
They get distracted easily, but rarely feel bored.
They are naturally drawn to more creative, detail-oriented and solitary careers.
They withdraw in crowds.
Small talk stresses them out, while deeper conversations make them feel alive.
They succeed on stage -- just not in the chit-chat afterwards.
They get distracted easily, but rarely feel bored.
They are naturally drawn to more creative, detail-oriented and solitary careers.
Why the minimum wage should be at least $15
Robert Reich does it again with another short clip that concisely explains the topic.
The US is so rich, and so poor
See this article for the details. The bullet points follow.
1. We are among the leaders in child poverty.
2. We lead the developed world in homelessness
3. We lead the world in student debt.
4. We lead the world in prisoners.
1. We are among the leaders in child poverty.
2. We lead the developed world in homelessness
3. We lead the world in student debt.
4. We lead the world in prisoners.
Thursday, December 25, 2014
Exodus
See this prior post. I saw it and the low ratings are deserved. Nevertheless, there are some interesting themes which I'll play off of this
review. Moses starts our mocking the superstitions of diviners and the
religious. He is a man of reason. But then he goes up the mountain to
encounter the burning bush. However this is depicted more as a
hallucination after Moses gets caught up in a flash flood and mudslide
in which he hits his head, is knocked unconscious and is buried in mud.
When he awakens he sees the hallucination and believes he has a
conversation with God's messenger. When he returns and tells his wife,
herself devoutly religious, she even believes its a delusion caused by
the hard knock.
Several other of the mythical story lines are depicted by Scott as having a more naturalistic explanation. The Nile turns red due to an unusually busy crocodile season. This causes the frogs to flee the bloody water and die. Their rotting corpses breed flies and pestilence. Meanwhile Moses, under his delusion, sees them all as signs of God to pursue his destiny of freeing the slaves of Egypt and returning them to their homeland.
Several other of the mythical story lines are depicted by Scott as having a more naturalistic explanation. The Nile turns red due to an unusually busy crocodile season. This causes the frogs to flee the bloody water and die. Their rotting corpses breed flies and pestilence. Meanwhile Moses, under his delusion, sees them all as signs of God to pursue his destiny of freeing the slaves of Egypt and returning them to their homeland.
Christmas, materialism and the loss of our humanity
From Robert Reich's FB post:
"The
deep imbalance within the American economy is not only income and
wealth. It’s also between the 'stuff' economy – including all the goods
we crowd into malls to buy for friends and family this holiday season –
and the 'we' economy – the schools, parks, playgrounds, clean air and
water, roads and public transportation, and public health and safety –
that we utilize together. The stuff economy is doing better; America is
producing more stuff and consumers are buying more stuff. But the 'we'
economy continues to deteriorate. State and local budgets are still
strained, while demands on the 'we' economy are growing.
Top 9 P2P trends in 2014
See this article for the details.
1. Reaching of the tipping point for (distributed) renewable energy
2. The rise of open cooperatives and ethical enterpreneurial coalitions
3. The emergence of cryptoledger applications and a crypto-currency for the commons
4. Cities and Countries of the Commons
1. Reaching of the tipping point for (distributed) renewable energy
2. The rise of open cooperatives and ethical enterpreneurial coalitions
3. The emergence of cryptoledger applications and a crypto-currency for the commons
4. Cities and Countries of the Commons
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Is there a P2P alternative to Facebook?
I asked this question over at P2P's FB page in this thread. It is generating a lot of responses from those that know P2P, as well as
those that speak geek about alternatives tried. Quite informative.
Another dimension
Seems I live in another dimension from which most others have no awareness, let alone a need therefrom. But I suppose it's nice to ask.
All Souls Night
I heard this one for the first time yesterday. It connected to my primal DNA, like some archetypal inheritance in my ancient biological ancestry. I like how it combines both Middle Eastern and Celtic melodic elements that penetrate to the very marrow of said inheritance. How she could be producing this enchantment for 30 years and I'm just now hearing of her?
v
v
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Paramodern god/desses
LP started a FB thread on how we might envision god/desses in today's world. My comments from that thread follow.
If we think of the Gods as Plato's intelligible forms and we mortals as the sensible forms, Khora gives birth to both. The Gods have specific characteristics and personalities. They come from Heaven as distinguished from Earth. They are the immortal Ideas in the Great Chain which descend into the mortal material. Khora is without idea, character, time (eternal or otherwise) or place.
Granted the notion of khora's time above sounds more than a bit metaphysical. Given Derrida's take on time, his khoratic differance sounds more like TSK's future infinitive, a future that never arrives, open indeterminativity. This is different than time as sequence or time as the eternal, man or God(s). See Balder's blog post on this.
If we think of the Gods as Plato's intelligible forms and we mortals as the sensible forms, Khora gives birth to both. The Gods have specific characteristics and personalities. They come from Heaven as distinguished from Earth. They are the immortal Ideas in the Great Chain which descend into the mortal material. Khora is without idea, character, time (eternal or otherwise) or place.
Granted the notion of khora's time above sounds more than a bit metaphysical. Given Derrida's take on time, his khoratic differance sounds more like TSK's future infinitive, a future that never arrives, open indeterminativity. This is different than time as sequence or time as the eternal, man or God(s). See Balder's blog post on this.
Sunday, December 21, 2014
Beggin for thread
I heard this song for the first time today and it hit me right upside the aesthetic.
Beaten dog syndrome
See this article, which highlights the Intro of a new book on why we stopped resisting income inequality. Like
chronically beaten dogs we think we get what we deserve. And that
nothing we do can change it so may as well eek out what little enjoyment
there is through sex or consumerism. That's why we need Elizabeth
Warren to be our next President, and Bernie Sanders to be our next VP.
Then we can believe again that we make a difference, that we can get
ahead through hard work, that our government represents us. We need a
leader like Warren to get us motivated, to get us to quit accepting the
status quo, to not only bark but to bite back and to get our just bones.
Language and thought can be 'enlightened' too
In
this video at 59:50 Thompson discusses the difference between Yogacara
and Madhyamaka on the self. He follows this with comparing them to the
neuroreductive and enactive views in cognitive science. The latter
includes social cognition through language,
so language is a legitimate part of a performative self, whereas in
Yogacara it is merely illusion. We discussed this quite a bit in the IPS
Batchelor thread. He sees the enactive view as a middle way where "the
self is a dependently originated process with a conventional identity."
The self is not an illusion while not being an independent essence
(1:05:30). Around 1:21:15 he is asked about the narrative self. He
responds that it is doesn't have to be seen as an fixed substance with
independent existence or substance (1:23:30). Which reiterates previous
points above that the narrative self through language is not necessarily
an illusion divorced from our pre-linguistic or core self but can be an
extension of it.
This also relates to the IPS real/false reason thread. Real reason, including language and discursive thought, when grounded in the pre-linguistic and pre-rational image schema as well as the emotions, is not of the same kind as false reason. The latter is ideationally abstract and creates the mind-body and other dualistically metaphysical splits. Hence we can have our cake (symbolic thought and language) and eat it too (connection with our pre-rational core selves). Which reminds me of one of my favorite David Loy quotes:
This also relates to the IPS real/false reason thread. Real reason, including language and discursive thought, when grounded in the pre-linguistic and pre-rational image schema as well as the emotions, is not of the same kind as false reason. The latter is ideationally abstract and creates the mind-body and other dualistically metaphysical splits. Hence we can have our cake (symbolic thought and language) and eat it too (connection with our pre-rational core selves). Which reminds me of one of my favorite David Loy quotes:
Worst Congress ever
So this was the regressive strategy. To do little to nothing and spin that it was everyone's fault when in fact it was theirs alone. Unfortunately the American people as a whole are too stupid to see that fact and fell for the spin that it's Congress generally, as well as the President, that are to blame. See this article for the details.
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Gidley's three times
Continuing from this post,
"Gebser’s
nuanced concretion of time does not represent a linear developmental
endpoint like that of the modernity project, nor is it endlessly
recursive in non-directional cyclical space as in Eliade’s 'myth of the
eternal return' (Eliade, 1954/1989). Integral consciousness as
understood by Gebser does not place mythic and modern constructions of
time in opposition to each other, as both modern and traditional
approaches tend to do. Alternatively, Gebser’s temporic concretion
is an intensification of consciousness that enables re-integration of
previous structures of consciousness—with their different time
senses—honoring them all. It opens to new understanding through
atemporal translucence whereby all times are present to the intensified consciousness in the same fully conscious moment" (176).
"Gebser sees integral time concretion as the point where consciousness folds back on itself and integrates the whole" (179) (my emphasis, see this thread).
"Gebser sees integral time concretion as the point where consciousness folds back on itself and integrates the whole" (179) (my emphasis, see this thread).
Religion and torture
See this article for the details. Only a majority of the non-religious are against it. But even in that category 40% support it, so something more than just religion is going on. Still, it says something.
Friday, December 19, 2014
DA knew witnesses were lying in the Brown grand jury
Wow. See the video below and this partial transcript. DA McCulloch knew some of the witnesses he presented to the grand jury were lying. He even admits that one witness, the one Fox has been quoting repeatedly, was never at the scene and just culled new reports for her false testimony. He rationalized that he had to present all the witnesses to be fair, total bullshit.
Meanwhile, you'd think he'd know that Missouri Supreme Court Rule 4-3.3 uneqivocally states:
Meanwhile, you'd think he'd know that Missouri Supreme Court Rule 4-3.3 uneqivocally states:
Andy Smith on Joe Perez
Continuing from this post, Andy Smith has entered the fray at Integral World in response to Joe Perez. I appreciated a lot of his sensible points. For now I'll mention the
one on context, that his anger has different types and levels depending
on context. That was a main point in every one of the developmentalists I
cited; and that there is no overall, consistent level overseeing all
the lines and contexts. Certainly not Spirit, or direct access to
consciousness per se in kennilingus.
As to this blog not receiving independent review, that's true, since I get few comments and respond to fewer still. However that is not true of the IPS forum, where I've had serious review from, and discussion with, several other peers.
As to this blog not receiving independent review, that's true, since I get few comments and respond to fewer still. However that is not true of the IPS forum, where I've had serious review from, and discussion with, several other peers.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
If the devil in in the details
then where is (the) god? Is it the most general of ideas? Devil/god, particular/general? Or part/whole? There is mereology in the question, the relationship between these two apparent ends of a spectrum. The answer is tantamount to how one sees god, the devil and everything in between.
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
This is exactly what you voted for
But have no clue that you did. The regressive spin machine turned you against yourselves and you don't even know it. Bill Maher is right; the American people are stupid.
The Evolution of Consciousness as a Planetary Imperative
Subtitle: An Integration of Integral Views. This
is Jennifer Gidley's book-length Ph.D. dissertation printed in toto in
Integral Review 5, 2007. I've referenced it in the forum several times
throughout the years so thought I'd give it a thread if anyone else
wants to read and discuss it. She compares and tries to integrate the
views of Wilber, Steiner and Gebser. Very instructive. I've enclosed a
few previous comments and quotes from the forum below about this work. See this IPS thread for ongoing discussion.
"For Gebser, integral-aperspectival consciousness is not experienced through expanded
consciousness, more systematic conceptualizations, or greater quantities of perspectives. In his view, such approaches largely represent over-extended, rational characteristics. Rather, it involves an actual re-experiencing, re-embodying, and conscious re-integration of the living vitality of magic-interweaving, the imagination at the heart of mythic-feeling and the purposefulness of mental conceptual thinking, their presence raised to a higher resonance, in order for the integral transparency to shine through" (111).
"For Gebser, integral-aperspectival consciousness is not experienced through expanded
consciousness, more systematic conceptualizations, or greater quantities of perspectives. In his view, such approaches largely represent over-extended, rational characteristics. Rather, it involves an actual re-experiencing, re-embodying, and conscious re-integration of the living vitality of magic-interweaving, the imagination at the heart of mythic-feeling and the purposefulness of mental conceptual thinking, their presence raised to a higher resonance, in order for the integral transparency to shine through" (111).
Monday, December 15, 2014
Krugman on Wall Street's Congressional dividends
See his blog post. Wall Street is backing Republicans by far and they got what they paid for in the recent budget rider on rolling back the Dodd-Frank provision allowing them to gamble with our money again, and have us bail them out again. Some Republicans claim to be against this too but their votes tell the story. Same for the corporate Dems. This is why it is critical that Elizabeth Warren becomes our next President and Bernie Sanders our next VP.
More liberal/conservative differences
See this article.
"A new Milgram-like experiment published this month in the Journal of Personality. [...] What researchers discovered was surprising: Those who are described as 'agreeable, conscientious personalities' are more likely to follow orders and deliver electric shocks that they believe can harm innocent people, while 'more contrarian, less agreeable personalities' are more likely to refuse to hurt others. [...] The study also found that people holding left-wing political views were less willing to hurt others. One particular group held steady and refused destructive orders: 'women who had previously participated in rebellious political activism such as strikes or occupying a factory.'"
"A new Milgram-like experiment published this month in the Journal of Personality. [...] What researchers discovered was surprising: Those who are described as 'agreeable, conscientious personalities' are more likely to follow orders and deliver electric shocks that they believe can harm innocent people, while 'more contrarian, less agreeable personalities' are more likely to refuse to hurt others. [...] The study also found that people holding left-wing political views were less willing to hurt others. One particular group held steady and refused destructive orders: 'women who had previously participated in rebellious political activism such as strikes or occupying a factory.'"
Sunday, December 14, 2014
Mindfulness on 60 Minutes
I
saw this segment on mindfulness tonight on 60 Minutes. Honestly it
sounded a LOT like this parody video posted earlier. For example, in the interview with
Kabat-Zinn:
" So, I get out of bed with awareness, brush my teeth with awareness. When you're in the shower next time check and see if you're in the shower."
" So, I get out of bed with awareness, brush my teeth with awareness. When you're in the shower next time check and see if you're in the shower."
This Changes Everything
An extended excerpt here from Naomi Klein's book This Changes Everything: Capitalism versus the Climate. A smidgen:
"I denied climate change for longer than I care to admit. I knew it was happening, sure. Not like Donald Trump and the Tea Partiers going on about how the continued existence of winter proves it’s all a hoax. But I stayed pretty hazy on the details and only skimmed most of the news stories, especially the really scary ones. I told myself the science was too complicated and that the environmentalists were dealing with it. And I continued to behave as if there was nothing wrong with the shiny card in my wallet attesting to my 'elite' frequent flyer status.
"I denied climate change for longer than I care to admit. I knew it was happening, sure. Not like Donald Trump and the Tea Partiers going on about how the continued existence of winter proves it’s all a hoax. But I stayed pretty hazy on the details and only skimmed most of the news stories, especially the really scary ones. I told myself the science was too complicated and that the environmentalists were dealing with it. And I continued to behave as if there was nothing wrong with the shiny card in my wallet attesting to my 'elite' frequent flyer status.
Senator Warren must become President of the US
Aside from Senator Sanders, Warren is the leader of the Progressive Party. At least the most vocal and the most in the media. Which is of course what we need to get her elected. She represents the people and fights the injustice of the current oligarchic and fascist corporatocracy. And she generates more piss and vinegar in the masses than Sanders. Sanders as her running mate would be ideal.
The following speech is being hailed as a game changer that could catapult her into the Presidency. I certainly hope so. As will most other most ordinary Americans of any political stripe, since she represents them.
By the way, Obama and the corporate Dems backed this spending Bill, including the rider for bailing out Wall Street again. This will be Hilary's exact same agenda. Hence to hell with Hilary and to progress with Warren. Warren/Sanders are the only hope of We the People, and if we the people don't get off our asses and support her for President then we get what we deserve.
The following speech is being hailed as a game changer that could catapult her into the Presidency. I certainly hope so. As will most other most ordinary Americans of any political stripe, since she represents them.
By the way, Obama and the corporate Dems backed this spending Bill, including the rider for bailing out Wall Street again. This will be Hilary's exact same agenda. Hence to hell with Hilary and to progress with Warren. Warren/Sanders are the only hope of We the People, and if we the people don't get off our asses and support her for President then we get what we deserve.
More on where you at
Continuing from this post, that
was the point of my providing the actual developmental research.
Stating that one is 'at' a level overall is not supported by the
research and per Stein more a dysfunctional, ideological interpretation.
This dysfunction is ironically more a leftover
from our capitalistic, competitive, self-involved 'orange' level, so
the accusation of Frank being orange is more a shadow projection from
this unconscious malady. Which is not to say Perez or the kennilinguists
are 'at' orange overall, just in this context when defending their
ideology through this particular pathology.
Recall this from Cook-Greuter's ITC '13 paper:
Recall this from Cook-Greuter's ITC '13 paper:
The two-party system is corrupt to the core
Robert Reich's statement below is why the US needs a more parliamentary system, where there are several parties and each get proportional representation in Congress. Robert Reich nails it on the split in the Democrat Party between the progressives and the corporate lackeys. Hence we need the Progressive Party led by Sanders and Warren as distinct from the corp-Dems (and Hilary). Here's Reich from his FB feed:
Saturday, December 13, 2014
The gravity of our configurations
Mark Schmanko started this FB IPS thread. Therein he said something that reminded me of Morton's hyperobjects. And Bryant's latest work is on
onto-cartography, how the gravity of objects and hyberobjects shape our perceptions. We discussed this a lot in the IPS OOO thread and elsewhere. Mark said:
Elitism
Desilet posted here on the motivation of elites. I get it and share it. I tend to push my own and standard performance
boundaries to achieve excellence. And I appreciate it in others, like
Michael Jordan or Ken Wilber. It's what keeps us growing. But there can
be a flip side in the tendency to leave everyone else behind, since they
drag us down and tether such soaring heights. I get it in spades as I
obviously have that syndrome. And yet there are some, like Balder, who
manage both the flight and the compassion to teach others, bring them at
least a bit closer to the Sun. It takes a special sort for both. Few
among us have that talent, certainly not I among them.
On metaphysical D(z)ogma
The following is my commentary on a recent turn in the IPS Desilet thread starting here, where andrew inquires about the relationship of Derrida and mystical Kabbalah, and the primacy of consciousness in Dzogchen:
I can offer some insight, having been an initiate into a Hermetic Qabalah system. Bottom line is that for them (magic) words can call into presence the actual things they represent. In most cases the things so called are from more subtle planes of existence, like angels and demons, all the way up to God. And that's because the words themselves are from a more subtle, higher plane of existence that prefigures material reality. In the beginning was the Word, and all that. It's the neo-perennial philosophy in practice and it doesn't seem Derrida would go along with that.
I can offer some insight, having been an initiate into a Hermetic Qabalah system. Bottom line is that for them (magic) words can call into presence the actual things they represent. In most cases the things so called are from more subtle planes of existence, like angels and demons, all the way up to God. And that's because the words themselves are from a more subtle, higher plane of existence that prefigures material reality. In the beginning was the Word, and all that. It's the neo-perennial philosophy in practice and it doesn't seem Derrida would go along with that.
Friday, December 12, 2014
More Congressional torture upon its citizens
Continuing from this post, here's more of what you idiots voted for in the form of the regressive spending bill. You must have beaten dog syndrome and consider painful punishment, even torture, to be what you think you deserve for being a bad dog.
Robert Reich on the economy
He states why it is the way it is in 2 minutes. It's easy to understand and it's based on accurate facts. And yet most Americans are idiots because they can't understand something this simple.
Eigenfunctions as the Fold
Recently at FB Bryant said this:
"Should I be pleased or dismayed that an information theory engineer just confirmed my ontology by teaching me about the mathematics of eigen functions?"
Joseph replied: "Eigen functions have to do with isomorphic mappings between spaces or domains. Sound familiar?"
Sure does, like the Rift or Fold I've long harped on. A picture from the wiki:
"Should I be pleased or dismayed that an information theory engineer just confirmed my ontology by teaching me about the mathematics of eigen functions?"
Joseph replied: "Eigen functions have to do with isomorphic mappings between spaces or domains. Sound familiar?"
Sure does, like the Rift or Fold I've long harped on. A picture from the wiki:
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Torture is as American as applie pie
And both are awesome. Stewart skewers the regressive lizard-brain reaction to the recent torture report.
More 'where you at' integral bullshit
Once again some engage in kennilingus by claiming that critics can't understand them because the latter are at an inferior level of development to grasp their elevated, elite view. It starts with this IPS post on Desilet's recent Integral World article, then continues a few posts later where there's an Integral World exchange between Visser and Perez. Perez's main argument is that one has to be at an integral level to get it, a common kennilingus canard. I provided the following quotes from leading developmental researchers doing empirical work in the field, where no such claim is ever made as to some overall level. Quite the contrary:
I like this from Ingersoll, an actual psychologist trained in Cook-Greuter's measurement metric:
"The idea of levels of consciousness is a metaphor that has not been supported to the point where one can say another person's outlook is totally filtered through a 'level' of consciousness. [...] There is no psychological test that functions to capture the whole of how a person experiences/interacts with the world. [...] I would suggest that retreating to metaphors of 'altitude' or 'levels of consciousness' shuts down the dialogue in the same way as the question 'Are you saved?'"
Also recall this from Kurt Fischer, who not only administers measurements of 'levels' but is one of the leading empirical researchers into their formulation.
I like this from Ingersoll, an actual psychologist trained in Cook-Greuter's measurement metric:
"The idea of levels of consciousness is a metaphor that has not been supported to the point where one can say another person's outlook is totally filtered through a 'level' of consciousness. [...] There is no psychological test that functions to capture the whole of how a person experiences/interacts with the world. [...] I would suggest that retreating to metaphors of 'altitude' or 'levels of consciousness' shuts down the dialogue in the same way as the question 'Are you saved?'"
Also recall this from Kurt Fischer, who not only administers measurements of 'levels' but is one of the leading empirical researchers into their formulation.
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Congressional cock suckers at it again
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Reclaim democracy
Lawrence Lessig gives an inspiring speech on inequality and how to fix it. Yet I'm losing hope that it's possible, for what he proposes--changing the way campaigns are financed--seems like it's impossible to accomplish given the facts he presents.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
The Democrats suck Wall Street cock too
See Robert Reich's article on the topic. Most of them are just as bad as the GOP when it comes to getting on their knees for money. Yes, there are a few exceptions like Sanders and Warren, but by and large the entire process is a giant, well-paid whore. And Hilary is on the payroll big time too. It's so frustrating that it's hard to give a shit anymore.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Faux Snooze just can't see the obvious
Colbert in his inimitable way shows how the regressives just can't see the obvious when it comes to killing unarmed black men.
Mindfulness as justification for ignoring capitalism
See this article.
"But for some Buddhists, and we include ourselves in this group, there is a growing concern that the mindfulness movement has the potential to push to the margins contemporary Buddhism’s dialogue with tradition, diminishing its capacity to serve as a challenge to materialist attitudes and values. The rapid mainstreaming of mindfulness has provided a domesticated and tame set of meditation techniques for mainly upper-middle-class and corporate elites so they may become more self-accepting of their anxieties, helping them to 'thrive,' to have it all—money, power and well-being, continuing business-as-usual more efficiently and, of course, more 'mindfully'—while conveniently side-stepping any serious soul searching into the causes of widespread social suffering."
"But for some Buddhists, and we include ourselves in this group, there is a growing concern that the mindfulness movement has the potential to push to the margins contemporary Buddhism’s dialogue with tradition, diminishing its capacity to serve as a challenge to materialist attitudes and values. The rapid mainstreaming of mindfulness has provided a domesticated and tame set of meditation techniques for mainly upper-middle-class and corporate elites so they may become more self-accepting of their anxieties, helping them to 'thrive,' to have it all—money, power and well-being, continuing business-as-usual more efficiently and, of course, more 'mindfully'—while conveniently side-stepping any serious soul searching into the causes of widespread social suffering."
Saturday, December 6, 2014
Chomsky on democracy and oligarchy
See the interview below. Turnout in the last election was so low because we don't feel like our voice matters anyway, since it doesn't. As has been made abundantly clear, the voice of the 1% rules and we know it. So why bother? The regressive lackeys in Congress have been all about ensuring that government doesn't work, knowing that we'll just blame it on the system and say 'fuck it.' And of course it worked. Meanwhile they manipulate just enough of their base with red meat to get them to the polls to win elections. I can fully understand why even Randi Rhodes retired from giving a shit.
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Racism is dead, right?
It is according to Fox (and the Supreme Corp.). So how does Fox go about telling us this? With Aryan Barbies...
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Sam Harris interviews Phil Zuckerman
Harris interviews Phil Zuckerman, author of Living the Secular Life. They start by differentiating the terms secular, secularization, secularism and atheism. Then this:
Harris: "Many of us have acknowledged that although 'replacing religion' may not be an appropriate goal, religion does offer people many things they want in life—and these are things that most atheists also want. We want nice buildings that function as dedicated spaces for reflection and celebration. We want strong communities. We want rituals and rites of passage with which to mark important transitions in life—births, marriages, deaths. We just don’t want to lie to ourselves about the nature of reality to have these things. This poses a real challenge, because once we get rid of religion, we are left without an established tradition for meeting these needs, and the alternative is often piecemeal, halfhearted, and unsatisfying."
Harris: "Many of us have acknowledged that although 'replacing religion' may not be an appropriate goal, religion does offer people many things they want in life—and these are things that most atheists also want. We want nice buildings that function as dedicated spaces for reflection and celebration. We want strong communities. We want rituals and rites of passage with which to mark important transitions in life—births, marriages, deaths. We just don’t want to lie to ourselves about the nature of reality to have these things. This poses a real challenge, because once we get rid of religion, we are left without an established tradition for meeting these needs, and the alternative is often piecemeal, halfhearted, and unsatisfying."
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Bernie Sanders 12-point economic plan
See the video below. The following bullet points work for everyone, even the rich.
- Invest in our crumbling infrastructure with a
major program to create jobs by rebuilding roads, bridges, water
systems, waste water plants, airports, railroads and schools.
– Transform energy systems away from fossil fuels to
create jobs while beginning to reverse global warming and make the
planet habitable for future generations.
Consciousness in dreamless sleep
In the following video Thompson describes around 37:00 what that consciousness is like as reported by
both advanced meditators and non-meditators. The former see it as a
luminous, non-dual awareness; the latter as a dark, non-dual awareness.
Which reminds me of this meditation.
At around 43:00 he thinks this state, in contradistinction with Vedanta, is "the sentient aliveness with the body," "a basal biological phenomenon." Vedanta sees it as the transcendental witness. See earlier in this thread, with links to the "states" thread.
Also see this IPS discussion thread on this work.
At around 43:00 he thinks this state, in contradistinction with Vedanta, is "the sentient aliveness with the body," "a basal biological phenomenon." Vedanta sees it as the transcendental witness. See earlier in this thread, with links to the "states" thread.
Also see this IPS discussion thread on this work.
Monday, December 1, 2014
Can capitalism and democracy co-exist?
See Chris Hedges' interview of Sheldon Wolin here. A few Wolin excerpts follow:
"There's been a kind of conjuncture between the way that social and educational institutions have shaped a certain kind of mentality among students, among faculty, and so on, and the media itself, that are in lockstep with the requirements of the kind of political economic order that we have now, and that the basic question, I think, has been that we have seen the kind of absorption of politics and the political order into so many nonpolitical categories--of economics, sociology, even religion--that we sort of lost the whole, it seems to me, unique character of political institutions, which is that they're supposed to embody the kind of substantive hopes of ordinary people, in terms of the kind of present and future that they want. And that's what democracy is supposed to be about."
"Nietzsche was trying to really retrieve a notion of the value, intrinsic value, of political life. And he found it, however, only comprehensible to him in terms of some kind of dichotomy between elite and mass. [...] Nietzsche would inevitably try to turn into vehicles for celebrating or encouraging elite formations. And he simply could not conceive of a society that would be worthwhile in which elites were not given the most prominent and leading role. He just couldn't conceive it. He had the kind of 19th century sort of Hegelian notion that the masses were ignorant, they were intolerant, they were against progress, and all the rest of it. He simply, like so many very good writers in the 19th century, didn't know what to do with the, quote, people."
"There's been a kind of conjuncture between the way that social and educational institutions have shaped a certain kind of mentality among students, among faculty, and so on, and the media itself, that are in lockstep with the requirements of the kind of political economic order that we have now, and that the basic question, I think, has been that we have seen the kind of absorption of politics and the political order into so many nonpolitical categories--of economics, sociology, even religion--that we sort of lost the whole, it seems to me, unique character of political institutions, which is that they're supposed to embody the kind of substantive hopes of ordinary people, in terms of the kind of present and future that they want. And that's what democracy is supposed to be about."
"Nietzsche was trying to really retrieve a notion of the value, intrinsic value, of political life. And he found it, however, only comprehensible to him in terms of some kind of dichotomy between elite and mass. [...] Nietzsche would inevitably try to turn into vehicles for celebrating or encouraging elite formations. And he simply could not conceive of a society that would be worthwhile in which elites were not given the most prominent and leading role. He just couldn't conceive it. He had the kind of 19th century sort of Hegelian notion that the masses were ignorant, they were intolerant, they were against progress, and all the rest of it. He simply, like so many very good writers in the 19th century, didn't know what to do with the, quote, people."
Jordan & Tatiana
Once again they won the US Open classic division. And yet again they choreographed another innovative and spectacular routine, performed to near perfection. Inspiring.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
If only
Many of these folks are the same idiots that either don't vote or vote to keep people enslaved working at Walmart for unlivable wages so that these folks can pay for their food stamps and housing assistance via taxes. But hey, it gives us bargain shopping at discount prices. What's important, right?
Idiot Americans get what they deserve
See this article showing that those who voted for regressive Republicans in the last election are getting screwed by the very same people they voted for. Yes it's true that the regressives manipulate said uneducated, ignorant voters with lies and spin. And that said voters are too busy trying to make ends meet to be politically involved, a situation again created by the very same regressives. And yet these people at some point have to take responsibility for keeping informed on the politics and the issues, and recognize who is really on their side and who is lying. If they don't the cycle will be perpetuated indefinitely. Which is of course fine for the regressives representatives and their 1% puppet masters, but not for us.
Background consensus trance
Mark Schmanko started an interesting FB IPS discussion on the background consensus trance (BCT) here. My comments so far:
There are ontologies without assholons, as I call them. And that don't colonize everything into their ontologies but leave space-time for change without an overriding telos. And still incorporate complexity and mereology but of a different sort. Perhaps read the 'flat' ontologies of the speculative realists and object-oriented ontologists? (Latour, Bryant, Morton, DeLanda, Protevi, Stengers, Badiou etc.) They also seem to avert the BCT, since there is no lockstep agreement about the field among them, though there are some very broad parameters of kinship.
There are ontologies without assholons, as I call them. And that don't colonize everything into their ontologies but leave space-time for change without an overriding telos. And still incorporate complexity and mereology but of a different sort. Perhaps read the 'flat' ontologies of the speculative realists and object-oriented ontologists? (Latour, Bryant, Morton, DeLanda, Protevi, Stengers, Badiou etc.) They also seem to avert the BCT, since there is no lockstep agreement about the field among them, though there are some very broad parameters of kinship.
The reasonable polis
At FB Bonnie linked to this essay. Therein we have Latour criticizing the 'reasonable' notion of
creating a broad generalization of the polis and then trying to fit
(pigeonhole) everything into this abstract model. For Socrates the base
was geometry, for McIntosh and 'mainstream'
integralists it's AQALingus. Both stem from this 'false' reason. This
sort of reason misses the democracy of objects Latour and the other
speculative realists and object-oriented ontologists enact. Theirs is a
'flat' ontology that still recognizes complexity and mereology, but of a
different kind. It's also the difference between real and false reason
so much expounded in the IPS thread of that name. All of which has been
explored at length and in depth at that wonderful Ning IPS forum from
which the FB one springs.
Friday, November 28, 2014
Walmart is so charitable
While workers protest the store today keep in mind that Walmart owners are not only stingy with wages.
Lakoff's Salon interview
Read it here. Some excerpts follow, with follow-up discussion at this IPS thread:
"People thought that when I was talking about framing that I was talking about words. This is what Frank Luntz keeps saying, 'Words that Work.' The reason he can do that is that on the right, the think tanks figured out the frames before he came along. All he had to do was supply the words for the frames, whereas we have to think out the whole thing. Moreover, the assumption was that there was no difference between framing and spin, which is utterly ridiculous. You do framing every time you talk, every time you think, because frames are what you use in thinking—they’re neural structures."
"[W]hen you start talking about the communications system that the right wing has set up, people think, 'Well, we’re Democrats and progressives, we don’t do that. We don’t set up a real communications system; that would be underhanded, that would be propaganda.' There’s a difference between saying what you believe in, getting your ideas out there, and propaganda to say what you believe. You tell the truth, that’s not propaganda."
"People thought that when I was talking about framing that I was talking about words. This is what Frank Luntz keeps saying, 'Words that Work.' The reason he can do that is that on the right, the think tanks figured out the frames before he came along. All he had to do was supply the words for the frames, whereas we have to think out the whole thing. Moreover, the assumption was that there was no difference between framing and spin, which is utterly ridiculous. You do framing every time you talk, every time you think, because frames are what you use in thinking—they’re neural structures."
"[W]hen you start talking about the communications system that the right wing has set up, people think, 'Well, we’re Democrats and progressives, we don’t do that. We don’t set up a real communications system; that would be underhanded, that would be propaganda.' There’s a difference between saying what you believe in, getting your ideas out there, and propaganda to say what you believe. You tell the truth, that’s not propaganda."
Thursday, November 27, 2014
The AQALack
Continuing from this post, and the ongoing IPS FB thread on the topic, part of the problem
with the epistemic fallacy is actualism. Now Wilber does account for the
non-actual via the timeless, changeless Causal real which subsists the
actual, but then turns around in the
next breath and asserts we can directly access the Causal via a non-dual
meditative state (aka satori), the Absolute side of the equation. Which
is exactly what Bryant is criticizing, that we can directly and
accurately 'know' not just this state, but that this state directly
accesses that Causal realm underlying the actual.
So yes, it's a fixation on enacting the interior state(s), because this 'consciousness per se' IS the metaphysical foundationalism of ALL, "for foundationalism is premised on the possibility of absolute presence." Bryant (and Morton) have the good sense to carefully read and understand Derrida on this metaphysics of presence.
So yes, it's a fixation on enacting the interior state(s), because this 'consciousness per se' IS the metaphysical foundationalism of ALL, "for foundationalism is premised on the possibility of absolute presence." Bryant (and Morton) have the good sense to carefully read and understand Derrida on this metaphysics of presence.
Exodus: Gods and Kings
I'm eagerly anticipating this
new movie under Ridley Scott's direction set to open Dec. 12. I've been
seeing previews for the last 2 months and it looks to be a cinematic
masterpiece as well as blockbuster. Especially with Christian Bale as
Moses under Scott's direction. The cinematography and CGI look
astounding from the previews. And the chemistry between Bale's Moses and
Joel Edgerton's Ramses looks fiercely intense.
It's also a good metaphor for today's saga of wage slavery, with Senator Warren leading the masses out of Egypt (poverty) against the indomitable will of the 1% played by Charles Koch. This IPS thread will serve as discussion prior to the film's release, as well as commentary after we've seen it.
It's also a good metaphor for today's saga of wage slavery, with Senator Warren leading the masses out of Egypt (poverty) against the indomitable will of the 1% played by Charles Koch. This IPS thread will serve as discussion prior to the film's release, as well as commentary after we've seen it.
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Bethany & Derek
This was their freestyle on Monday night. It was the popular pick for the encore performance on last night's finale.
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
The epistemic fallacy
Here's Bryant from The Democracy of Objects, section 1.5:
"Here it is necessary to clarify what the epistemic fallacy is and is not about. A critique of the epistemic fallacy and how it operates in philosophy does not amount to the claim that epistemology or questions of the nature of inquiry and knowledge are a fallacy. What the epistemic fallacy identifies is the fallacy of reducing ontological questions to epistemological questions, or conflating questions of how we know with questions of what beings are. In short, the epistemic fallacy occurs wherever being is reduced to our access to being. Thus, for example, wherever beings are reduced to our impressions or sensations of being, wherever being is reduced to our talk about being, wherever being is reduced to discourses about being, wherever being is reduced to signs through which being is manifest, the epistemic fallacy has been committed.
"Here it is necessary to clarify what the epistemic fallacy is and is not about. A critique of the epistemic fallacy and how it operates in philosophy does not amount to the claim that epistemology or questions of the nature of inquiry and knowledge are a fallacy. What the epistemic fallacy identifies is the fallacy of reducing ontological questions to epistemological questions, or conflating questions of how we know with questions of what beings are. In short, the epistemic fallacy occurs wherever being is reduced to our access to being. Thus, for example, wherever beings are reduced to our impressions or sensations of being, wherever being is reduced to our talk about being, wherever being is reduced to discourses about being, wherever being is reduced to signs through which being is manifest, the epistemic fallacy has been committed.
Monday, November 24, 2014
Is propaganda just an illusion?
In the FB IPS forum Fractal Organism started a thread on the epistemic fallacy. I responded to his statement that "the world we create is necessarily a world of propaganda, and by extension a world of delusions and illusions" with the following:
"I disagree that propaganda by extension is delusion and illusion. See my most recent post in the Lakoff thread on the movie Mockingjay. Like in the movie [...] propaganda requires an emotional connection to motivate and inspire people to action, like framing per Lakoff. It isn't necessarily about creating an illusion but about creating embodied and emotional connection with ideas.
FO: "ok, agreed, but making something embodied and emotional doesnt necessarily take the illusion out, it just gives it tangibility."
Me:
"I disagree that propaganda by extension is delusion and illusion. See my most recent post in the Lakoff thread on the movie Mockingjay. Like in the movie [...] propaganda requires an emotional connection to motivate and inspire people to action, like framing per Lakoff. It isn't necessarily about creating an illusion but about creating embodied and emotional connection with ideas.
FO: "ok, agreed, but making something embodied and emotional doesnt necessarily take the illusion out, it just gives it tangibility."
Me:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
"In the coming decades we are almost certainly going to see a society the likes of which has never existed and can scarcely be imagined. I argue in this book that if that new society is going to be one in which we want to live, it will require fundamental change in the political economy. Capitalism as we know it has got to go."
"What do I mean by post-capitalist democracy? I mean a society expressly committed to democratic practices first and foremost, and one that directly addresses the ways that really existing capitalism is inimical to democracy, human freedom, and ecological sustainability. I use the term "really existing capitalism" for a reason. I refer to the capitalism of massive corporations, commercial propaganda, political corruption, obscene inequality, poverty, stagnation, militarism, and endless greed. That capitalism, the one people actually experience, is the main impediment to democracy in the United States today.I am not therefore referring to the classroom fantasy of capitalism as a bunch of heroic little-guy entrepreneurs competing for the betterment of consumers, and creating jobs in the communities they inhabit. This is the 'free market' system of public relations missives and politicians' blarney."
"As Noam Chomsky put it, if you act like social change for the better is impossible, you guarantee it will be impossible. That is the choice we all have to make when we look into the mirror. Pessimism is self-fulfilling; it is no way to live."