Conclusion about math

Continuing the last post,  all of this is not to deny that the MHC is useful. All math is useful depending on the context in which it is used. Where the MHC is wrong is that it assumes its premises are ontological and thereby makes claims to reality as such. All of the above points to a multiplicity of useful and consistent maths and metaphors, often contradictory, where none of them owns the exclusive claim to reality as such. And different models are required to describe more accurately this diversity instead of one universal model for them all. Which is, btw, a more accurate tenet of postmetaphysics.