Btw, 18 U.S.C., Section 793-F states "Whoever, being entrusted with...national security documents... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." No where does it say intent is a requirement.
Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, postmetaphysics, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
FBI does not recommend Clinton prosecution
In the email scandal. They found that Clinton indeed did send classified information, including some labelled top secret, on her unsecured server. But since they couldn't find intent they don't think any crimes were committed. It's a twisted and biased interpretation of intent to let her off, and criminal in its own right. Once again proving, the top 1% are immune from criminal prosecution is this corrupt system. Just don't get caught with some pot though; that must be punished.
Btw, 18 U.S.C., Section 793-F states "Whoever, being entrusted with...national security documents... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." No where does it say intent is a requirement.
Btw, 18 U.S.C., Section 793-F states "Whoever, being entrusted with...national security documents... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." No where does it say intent is a requirement.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.