And yet most involved in evolutionary biology dispute such a teleology. "Some used to believe that evolution was progressive and had a direction
that led towards so-called 'higher organisms,' despite a lack of
evidence for this viewpoint.[3] This idea of 'progression' and 'higher organisms' in evolution is now regarded as misleading, with natural selection
having no intrinsic direction and organisms selected for either
increased or decreased complexity in response to local environmental
conditions." [4]
So where's the spirituality in that?
Perhaps we'd have to consider spirituality (and teleology)
differently in light of such science? One such spiritual scientist
doing so is Evan
Thompson, who is trained in Buddhist meditation and is a Buddhist
scholar. In this
paper he discusses a naturalistic meaning of teleology, one where
it “arises from
autopoiesis [...] and is none other than the organism’s
sense-making. […] Sense-making is not a feature of the autopoietic
organization, but rather of the coupling of a concrete autopoietic
system and its environment. In other words, teleology is not an
intrinsic organizational property, but an emergent relational one
that belongs to a concrete autopoietic system interacting with its
environment” (391-92).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.