He has endorsed Clinton but nonetheless said the following here. He is describing not a democracy but an oligarchy.
"Our nation maintains a separate and unequal criminal justice system that is stratified according to wealth and power. [...] We cannot ignore that any other career Foreign Service officer or
governmental official with security clearances would have been charged
with a criminal offense, fired or both. Most would have faced arrest and
indictment by federal agents and prosecutors, not a public press
conference where the head of the FBI makes arguments usually proffered
by defense counsel that has been retained at great expense by the
accused. If for no other reason, this is disconcerting because the only
thing that keeps our nation of laws intact is belief that no person is
above the law."
"In 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order 13526, one that proscribed penalties for mishandling such information. To be clear, there is no dispute that then-Secretary of State Clinton
acknowledged, by signing a nondisclosure agreement, the rules governing
the knowing or negligent mishandling of classified information.
Nevertheless, Clinton used a private email account and home-brew server
located in her New York state home to conduct official business while
serving as secretary of State."
"Comey's comments constitute a form of legal sophistry in that
prosecutors did not need to prove that Clinton intended to commit a
criminal act. Comey and staunch Clinton apologists keep providing cover
by adding that element — intent — that simply is not needed. Indeed,
under federal and state laws, negligence roughly means an 'indifference'
or careless attitude toward the proscribed conduct and with Comey
calling the conduct 'extremely careless,' an argument can be made that
Clinton was grossly negligent in her acts."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.