Yes, he's writing for the National Review, with which I seldom agree. But when they're right they're right. Some excepts:
"There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James
Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine),
Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of
Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access
to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in
removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of
custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to
others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust."
"Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law
violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to
harm the United States [...] In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote
the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require.
The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a
statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that
government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national
defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to
gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of
intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad
things that happen due to gross negligence."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.