Ok, maybe not in the US. But still it's flowering elsewhere. Following up on this post,
here's a 2010 'integral' Rifkin riff on the emerging ecological
consciousness. To highlight from the below: "Making global connections
without any real transcendent purpose risks a narrowing rather than an
expanding of human consciousness." The rest:
"The
real crisis lies in the set of assumptions about human nature that
governs the behavior of world leaders--assumptions that were spawned
during the Enlightenment more than 200 years ago at the dawn of the
modern market economy and the emergence of the nation state era. The
Enlightenment thinkers--John Locke, Adam Smith, Marquis de Condorcet et.
al.--took umbrage with the Medieval Christian world view that saw human
nature as fallen and depraved and that looked to salvation in the next
world through God's grace. They preferred to cast their lot with the
idea that human beings' essential nature is rational, detached,
autonomous, acquisitive and utilitarian and argued that individual
salvation lies in unlimited material progress here on Earth.
"The
Enlightenment notions about human nature were reflected in the newly
minted nation-state whose raison d'ĂȘtre was to protect private property
relations and stimulate market forces as well as act as a surrogate of
the collective self-interest of the citizenry in the international
arena. Like individuals, nation-states were considered to be autonomous
agents embroiled in a relentless battle with other sovereign nations in
the pursuit of material gains.
"It was these very
assumptions that provided the philosophical underpinnings for a
geopolitical frame of reference that accompanied the first and second
industrial revolutions in the 19th and 20th centuries. These beliefs
about human nature came to the fore in the aftermath of the global
economic meltdown and in the boisterous and acrimonious confrontations
in the meeting rooms in Copenhagen, with potentially disastrous
consequences for the future of humanity and the planet.
"What
is required now is nothing less than a leap to global empathic
consciousness and in less than a generation if we are to resurrect the
global economy and revitalize the biosphere. The question becomes this:
what is the mechanism that allows empathic sensitivity to mature and
consciousness to expand through history?
"The
pivotal turning points in human consciousness occur when new energy
regimes converge with new communications revolutions, creating new
economic eras. [...] Today, we are on the cusp of another historic
convergence of energy and communication. [...] Whether in fact we will
begin to empathize as a species will depend on how we use the new
distributed communication medium. While distributed communications
technologies-and, soon, distributed renewable energies - are connecting
the human race, what is so shocking is that no one has offered much of a
reason as to why we ought to be connected. We talk breathlessly about
access and inclusion in a global communications network but speak little
of exactly why we want to communicate with one another on such a
planetary scale. What's sorely missing is an overarching reason that
billions of human beings should be increasingly connected. Toward what
end? The only feeble explanations thus far offered are to share
information, be entertained, advance commercial exchange and speed the
globalization of the economy. All the above, while relevant, nonetheless
seem insufficient to justify why nearly seven billion human beings
should be connected and mutually embedded in a globalized society. The
idea of even billion individual connections, absent any overall unifying
purpose, seems a colossal waste of human energy. More important, making
global connections without any real transcendent purpose risks a
narrowing rather than an expanding of human consciousness. But what if
our distributed global communication networks were put to the task of
helping us re-participate in deep communion with the common biosphere
that sustains all of our lives?
"If we can harness
our empathic sensibility to establish a new global ethic that recognizes
and acts to harmonize the many relationships that make up the
life-sustaining forces of the planet, we will have moved beyond the
detached, self-interested and utilitarian philosophical assumptions that
accompanied national markets and nation state governance and into a new
era of biosphere consciousness. We leave the old world of geopolitics
behind and enter into a new world of biosphere politics, with new forms
of governance emerging to accompany our new biosphere awareness.
"Continentalization
is already bringing with it a new form of governance. The nation-state,
which grew up alongside the First and Second Industrial Revolutions,
and provided the regulatory mechanism for managing an energy regime
whose reach was the geosphere, is ill suited for a Third Industrial
Revolution whose domain is the biosphere. Distributed renewable energies
generated locally and regionally and shared openly--peer to
peer--across vast contiguous land masses connected by intelligent
utility networks and smart logistics and supply chains favor a seamless
network of governing institutions that span entire continents.
"The
European Union is the first continental governing institution of the
Third Industrial Revolution era. The EU is already beginning to put in
place the infrastructure for a European-wide energy regime, along with
the codes, regulations, and standards to effectively operate a seamless
transport, communications, and energy grid that will stretch from the
Irish Sea to the doorsteps of Russia by midcentury. Asian, African, and
Latin American continental political unions are also in the making and
will likely be the premier governing institutions on their respective
continents by 2050.
"In this new era of distributed
energy, governing institutions will more resemble the workings of the
ecosystems they manage. Just as habitats function within ecosystems, and
ecosystems within the biosphere in a web of interrelationships,
governing institutions will similarly function in a collaborative
network of relationships with localities, regions, and nations all
embedded within the continent as a whole. This new complex political
organism operates like the biosphere it attends, synergistically and
reciprocally. This is biosphere politics.
"The new
biosphere politics transcends traditional right/left distinctions so
characteristic of the geopolitics of the modern market economy and
nation-state era. The new divide is generational and contrasts the
traditional top-down model of structuring family life, education,
commerce, and governance with a younger generation whose thinking is
more relational and distributed, whose nature is more collaborative and
cosmopolitan, and whose work and social spaces favor open-source
commons. For the Internet generation, "quality of life" becomes as
important as individual opportunity in fashioning a new dream for the
21st century.
"The transition to biosphere consciousness has already begun."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.