Following up on this post, this
Abramson article on Reggie Watts, the band leader for The Late Late
Show, sees Watts as a metamodernist artist. A few relevant excerpts:
"Back in the early twentieth century, a number of European literary movements, including Dadaism, Futurism, and Surrealism,
bred young radicals who used wild-eyed manifestos and ultra-challenging
experimental literature to force workaday men and women to more
carefully consider the pitfalls of modern living. While sometimes this
form of social protest included an element of performance, more commonly
it was found in texts that—ironically—only the Continental
intelligentsia were likely to ever come across. The aim of all these
movements was nevertheless an admirable one: To make the conditions
under which art is created and performed every bit as dramatic and
complex as the conditions under which those who don’t make art are
forced to live. Unfortunately, somewhere along the way this ambitious
aim got sidetracked and stifled in the offices and classrooms of
university-dwelling English scholars. Metamodernistic artists like Watts
offer our best hope, now, of once again seeing America’s artist class
making art directly relevant to how we live today."
"Perhaps
it’s not surprising, then, that metamodernists like Watts don't go in
for reductive titles like "filmmaker" or "poet" or "novelist" or
"musician"; today's most innovative work not only crosses all boundaries
of genre but in fact ignores such boundaries altogether. We see it as
much in poetry as in songwriting, as much in fiction as in comedy. This
metamodernist approach weaves together different planes of reality and
modes of communication to build the sort of uneasy coherence that allows
us to survive them intact. In other words, while it may often seem, in
the Internet Age, that a stable self-identity is a luxury few of us can
access or afford, what metamodernism offers us—all of us—is a way to
locate an authentic self even in the midst of contemporary America’s
chaotic, social media-driven culture."
"Excellence
in multiple types of language—and in the realities those languages
create for us—rather than specializing in obscure theories about how
individual parcels of language sometimes operate. It's like today's
young innovators are looking upward, toward the many different realities
layered atop our everyday one, whereas yesterday's aging innovators are
forever looking down, trying to see how many angels (or European
scholars) they can fit on the head of a pin (or in scholarly treatises
no one reads)."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.