See this Evonomics article on the topic based on Tomasello's research in this article. You can also see his latest research in his 2019 book Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. You can find a free copy here. It supports that cooperatives are much more in line with our evolutionary heritage than the corporate structure, thus highlighting the different focuses in evolutionary theory itself.
"New peer-reviewed research by Michael Tomasello, an American
psychologist and co-director of the Max Planck Institute for
Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, has synthesized three
decades of research to develop a comprehensive evolutionary theory of
human cooperation. What can we learn about sharing as a result?
"Tomasello holds that there were two key steps that led to humans’ unique
form of interdependence. The first was all about who was coming to
dinner. Approximately two million years ago, a fledgling species known
as Homo habilis emerged on the great plains of Africa. At the
same time that these four-foot-tall, bipedal apes appeared, a period of
global cooling produced vast, open environments. This climate change
event ultimately forced our hominid ancestors to adapt to a new way of
life or perish entirely. Since they lacked the ability to take down
large game, like the ferocious carnivores of the early Pleistocene, the
solution they hit upon was scavenging the carcasses of recently killed
large mammals. The analysis of fossil bones from this period has
revealed evidence of stone-tool cut marks overlaid on top of carnivore
teeth marks. The precursors of modern humans had a habit of arriving
late to the feast.
"However, this survival strategy brought an entirely new set of
challenges: Individuals now had to coordinate their behaviors, work
together, and learn how to share. For apes living in the dense
rainforest, the search for ripe fruit and nuts was largely an individual
activity. But on the plains, our ancestors needed to travel in groups
to survive, and the act of scavenging from a single animal carcass
forced proto-humans to learn to tolerate each other and allow each other
a fair share. This resulted in a form of social selection that favored
cooperation: 'Individuals who attempted to hog all of the food at a
scavenged carcass would be actively repelled by others,' writes
Tomasello, 'and perhaps shunned in other ways as well.' [...]
"The second step in Tomasello’s theory leads directly into what kinds
of businesses and economies are more in line with human evolution.
Humans have, of course, uniquely large population sizes—much larger than
those of other primates. It was the human penchant for cooperation that
allowed groups to grow in number and eventually become tribal
societies.
"Humans, more than any other primate, developed psychological
adaptations that allowed them to quickly recognize members of their own
group (through unique behaviors, traditions, or forms of language) and
develop a shared cultural identity in the pursuit of a common goal. 'The
result,' says Tomasello, 'was a new kind of interdependence and
group-mindedness that went well beyond the joint intentionality of
small-scale cooperation to a kind of collective intentionality at the
level of the entire society.'"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.